Introduction
Upper GI bleed (UGIB) is a common reason for ED visits with a major cause of morbidity, mortality and medical care costs. Peptic ulcer accounts for at least 50% of UGIB cases. Patients with UGIB usually present with hematemesis, melena and/or hematochezia.
Key Clinical Considerations
- Upon presentation, hemodynamic status should be evaluated and resuscitation provided if necessary, including blood transfusion for target hemoglobin ≥7 g/dL
- Patients can be risk stratified using the Rockall score (clinical/pre-endoscopy; range 0–7, full Rockall 0–11) and Blatchford score (range 0–23)
- PPIs remain one of the mainstays of pharmacological therapy for the management of UGIB
- PPI can be initiated if endoscopy cannot be performed, will be delayed >24 hours after presentation, or following endoscopy
PPI Pharmacology Comparison
| Parameter | Pantoprazole | Esomeprazole | Omeprazole |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose
|
Initial Infusion: 80 mg bolus then 8 mg/hr continuous ×72 hrs Intermittent: 80 mg LD then 40 mg IVP Q12H Maintenance High-risk: 40 mg PO BID ×14 days, then 40 mg PO daily Low-risk: 20 mg PO daily *Duration 4–12 weeks |
Initial Infusion: 80 mg bolus then 8 mg/hr continuous ×72 hrs Intermittent: 80 mg LD then 40 mg IVP Q12H Maintenance High-risk: 40 mg PO BID ×14 days, then 40 mg PO daily Low-risk: 20 mg PO daily *Duration 4–12 weeks |
Initial IV omeprazole not available in the U.S.; give IV pantoprazole or esomeprazole Maintenance High-risk: 40 mg PO BID ×14 days, then 40 mg PO daily Low-risk: 20 mg PO daily *Duration 4–12 weeks |
|
Administration
|
IVP: Over at least 2 minutes Infusion: 8 mg/hr PO: Swallow whole 30–60 min before food |
IVP: Over at least 3 min for <80 mg; LD over 30 min Infusion: 8 mg/hr PO: Capsule oral or opened with 50 mL water for NG |
PO: Swallow whole 30–60 min before food |
|
PK/PD
|
Onset: IV 15–30 min; PO 2.5 hrs Duration: 24 hrs (IV & PO) Distribution: 98% albumin bound t½: 1 hr; 3.5–10 hrs in CYP2C19 deficiency Excretion: Urine 71%, feces 18% |
Distribution: 97% protein bound Metabolism: Hepatic via CYP2C19 t½: 1–1.5 hrs Excretion: Urine 80%, feces 20% |
Onset: PO 1 hr Duration: Up to 72 hrs Distribution: 95% albumin bound t½: 30 min–1 hr; 3 hrs hepatic impairment Excretion: Urine 77% |
|
Adverse Effects
|
Headache
Nausea
Abdominal pain
Diarrhea
Vomiting
|
Headache
Flatulence
Nausea
Dyspepsia
Diarrhea
|
Headache
Abdominal pain
Nausea
Diarrhea
Flatulence
|
|
Drug Interactions & Warnings
|
Contraindicated: Rilpivirine-containing products Avoid / not recommended: Atazanavir, nelfinavir (ARV label-specific); CYP2C19 inducers (rifampin, St. John’s wort) |
Contraindicated: Rilpivirine-containing products Avoid / not recommended: Atazanavir, nelfinavir (ARV label-specific); CYP2C19 inducers (rifampin, St. John’s wort) |
Contraindicated: Rilpivirine-containing products Avoid / not recommended: Atazanavir, nelfinavir (ARV label-specific); CYP2C19 inducers (rifampin, St. John’s wort) |
|
Compatibility
|
D5W, NS, or LR | D5W, NS, or LR | N/A |
Clinical Pearl
PPIs may increase the risk of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea — use the lowest dose and shortest duration where possible.
Overview of Key Evidence
| Author / Year | Design (n) | Intervention | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daneshmend et al., 19924 |
RCT (Double-blind)
n=1,147 |
Omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus followed by 40 mg IV Q8H ×3, then 40 mg PO BID vs placebo. Treatment started within 12h of admission. |
No diff: transfusions, rebleeding, surgery, death
Significant reduction in endoscopic UGIB signs: 33% vs 45% (p<0.0001) |
| Lau et al., 200011 Landmark |
RCT (Double-blind)
n=240 |
Omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr ×72h vs placebo, after endoscopic hemostasis of actively bleeding ulcers or non-bleeding visible vessels |
30-d rebleeding 6.7% vs 22.5% (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7–9.0)
Foundational trial establishing high-dose IV PPI after endoscopic therapy. Most rebleeds occurred during the 72h infusion. |
| Lau et al., 200712 |
RCT (Double-blind)
n=638 |
Omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr vs placebo, before endoscopy (pre-emptive; next-morning endoscopy) |
Less need for endoscopic Rx: 19.1% vs 28.4% (P=0.007)
Pre-endoscopy PPI downstaged lesions but did not reduce rebleeding, surgery, or mortality. |
| Andriulli et al., 20085 |
RCT (Multicenter)
n=474 |
PPI continuous (80 mg bolus then 8 mg/hr ×72h) vs PPI intermittent (40 mg IV bolus daily ×72h); switched to oral PPI after 72h |
Rebleed: 11.8% continuous vs 8.1% intermittent (P=0.18)
Continuous group had prolonged hospital stay >5 days (P=0.03) |
| Sung et al., 20096 |
RCT (Multicenter)
n=764 |
Esomeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr vs placebo ×72h after endoscopic hemostasis; both groups received esomeprazole 40 mg PO daily ×27 days |
Less rebleeding at 72h: 5.9% vs 10.3% (difference 4.4%, P=0.026; sustained at 7 & 30 d, P=0.010)
Decreased re-treatment (6.4% vs 11.6%), surgery (2.7% vs 5.4%), mortality (0.8% vs 2.1%) |
| Sreedharan et al., 20107 |
SR & Meta-analysis
6 RCTs, n=2,223 |
PPI (oral or IV) vs placebo, H2RA, or no treatment before endoscopy |
No decrease: mortality, rebleeding, surgery
PPIs reduced endoscopic stigmata and reduced endoscopic intervention |
| Chen et al., 20128 |
RCT (Prospective)
n=201 |
Pantoprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr vs pantoprazole 40 mg IV bolus once daily ×72h; both groups received PO PPI ×27 days |
No diff in transfusions, LOS, surgery, mortality
High-dose PPI not superior to standard-dose for recurrent bleeding at 30 days |
| Sachar et al., 20149 |
SR & Meta-analysis
13 RCTs |
Intermittent PPI doses (IV or PO) vs 80 mg IV bolus followed by 8 mg/hr ×72h |
Intermittent non-inferior to continuous
No difference in recurrent bleeding between intermittent vs continuous PPI |
| Rattanasupar et al., 201610 |
RCT (Prospective)
n=113 |
Pantoprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr vs pantoprazole 40 mg IV twice daily |
No diff: LOS, transfusion, rebleed, mortality
Blatchford >10–12 showed high sensitivity for predicting high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding |
Clinical Conclusions
Bottom Line
Timing relative to endoscopy is everything. Before endoscopy, high-dose IV PPI downstages high-risk stigmata and reduces the need for endoscopic therapy, but does not improve mortality, rebleeding, or surgery. After endoscopic hemostasis of high-risk stigmata, high-dose PPI significantly reduces rebleeding and is standard of care. Continuous and intermittent high-dose PPI regimens are equivalent.
Before endoscopy: high-dose IV PPI downstages high-risk endoscopic stigmata and reduces the need for endoscopic therapy, but does not improve mortality, rebleeding, or surgery (Lau 200712; Sreedharan Cochrane 20107; Daneshmend 19924).
After endoscopic hemostasis of high-risk stigmata: high-dose PPI significantly reduces rebleeding and is standard of care (Lau 200011: 6.7% vs 22.5%, HR 3.9; Sung 20096: 5.9% vs 10.3% at 72h, P=0.026). This is the pearl’s key teaching point.
Continuous and intermittent high-dose PPI are equivalent — intermittent dosing is non-inferior to the classic 80 mg bolus + 8 mg/hr continuous infusion (Sachar 20149; ACG 202114).
What the guidelines say
- After endoscopic hemostasis of high-risk ulcers (active spurting/oozing or a non-bleeding visible vessel): high-dose PPI — given continuously OR intermittently — for 3 days, then twice-daily oral PPI for the first 2 weeks (ACG 202114; International Consensus/ICON 201913).
- Intermittent PPI is non-inferior to the classic 80 mg bolus + 8 mg/hr continuous infusion (Sachar meta-analysis 20149) — guidelines now explicitly permit either.
- Pre-endoscopy PPI reduces high-risk endoscopic stigmata and the need for endoscopic therapy but does not change rebleeding, surgery, or mortality (Lau 200712; Sreedharan Cochrane 20107). It is optional and should never delay endoscopy.
- Note: IV omeprazole is not marketed in the U.S.; equivalent high-dose regimens use IV pantoprazole or esomeprazole. Verify your institution's protocol and formulary.
Full Reference List
- Clinical Pharmacology [Electronic version]. Elsevier, Tampa, FL. Retrieved February 17, 2021.
- UpToDate [Electronic version]. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
- Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of Patients With Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(3):345–360.
- Daneshmend TK, et al. Omeprazole versus placebo for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. 1992;304(6820):143–147.
- Andriulli A, et al. High- versus low-dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(12):3011–3018.
- Sung JJ, et al. Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):455–464.
- Sreedharan A, et al. Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD005415.
- Chen CC, et al. Randomised clinical trial: high-dose vs. standard-dose proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of recurrent haemorrhage after combined endoscopic haemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(8):894–903.
- Sachar H, et al. Intermittent vs continuous proton pump inhibitor therapy for high-risk bleeding ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(11):1755–1762.
- Rattanasupar A, Sengmanee S. Comparison of high dose and standard dose proton pump inhibitor before endoscopy in patients with non-portal hypertension bleeding. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(9):988–995. PMID: 29927201.
- Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(5):310–316. PMID: 10922420.
- Lau JY, Leung WK, Wu JC, et al. Omeprazole before endoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(16):1631–1640. PMID: 17442905.
- Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(11):805–822. PMID: 31634917.
- Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(5):899–917. PMID: 33929377.
Never Miss a Friday Pearl
Get Pharmacy Pearls in your inbox every Friday
Free weekly clinical pearls written for pharmacists. Practical, evidence-based, and built for bedside use.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.