
PACULit
Stay ahead in your specialty without falling behind in your schedule. Daily literature updates, audio summaries, and CE credits tailored for healthcare professionals.
Start Your Free Week See Sample ContentWho This Is For
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Pediatrics
Oncology
Internal Medicine/ID/Cardiology
Specialty Pharmacy
Why PACULit?
5-Minute Updates
Get the evidence you need without the research burden. Expert-curated studies delivered daily in digestible formats.
Specialty Focused
Choose tracks tailored to your practice: Emergency/Critical Care, Pediatrics, Oncology, Internal Medicine, and Specialty Pharmacy.
Audio Learning
Transform your commute into learning time with 5-minute audio overviews of key studies and clinical implications.
CE Credits Included
Earn 3-5 hours of continuing education credits monthly while staying current with the latest evidence.
Choose Your Specialty Track
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Sepsis management, resuscitation protocols, shock states, and critical care therapeutics
Select TrackPediatrics
Age-specific dosing, pediatric RCTs, safety data, and developmental considerations
Select TrackOncology
Novel agents, immunotherapy, CAR-T developments, and supportive care protocols
Select TrackInternal Medicine/ID/Cardiology
Heart failure, antimicrobial stewardship, diabetes care, and general medical conditions
Select TrackSpecialty Pharmacy
High-cost biologics, rare diseases, complex therapeutics, and clinical outcomes
Select TrackExperience PACULit
📚 LearnDash Course Experience
Interactive learning with CE credits - Sample from our Emergency Medicine track

PACULit Daily Literature Update
Landiolol for refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
Gelbenegger G, Jilma B, Horvath LC, et al. Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110273-. PMID: 38866231.
📖 Introduction
Refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest represents one of the most challenging scenarios in emergency medicine, with historically poor outcomes despite advances in resuscitation protocols. This landmark trial assessed whether landiolol, a short-acting beta-blocker, could improve clinical outcomes when added to standard advanced life support measures.
📊 Study Design & Methodology
Study Type: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
Population: 36 patients with refractory VF after OHCA
Intervention: 20 mg bolus infusion of landiolol vs placebo
Primary Outcome: Time to sustained ROSC
Safety Endpoints: Incidence of bradycardia and asystole during resuscitation
🔍 Key Findings
- Primary Outcome: No difference in median time to sustained ROSC: 39 min (landiolol) vs 41 min (placebo) - p = 0.84
- Efficacy Concern: Sustained ROSC rate actually lower with landiolol (36.8%) compared to placebo (64.7%)
- Safety Signal: Asystole occurred significantly more frequently in landiolol group (36.8%) vs none in placebo group
- Clinical Implication: Landiolol may actually worsen outcomes in this critical population
🔬 Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis & Clinical Context
The findings of Gelbenegger et al. provide crucial high-quality evidence that challenges previous observational data and reinforces current guideline recommendations against beta-blocker use in acute refractory VF scenarios.
🏛️ Guideline Landscape
- Panchal et al., 2020 (AHA Guidelines): American Heart Association guidelines explicitly do not recommend beta-blockers for refractory VF resuscitation, establishing clear standard of care protocols
- Soar et al., 2021 (ERC Guidelines): European Resuscitation Council guidelines similarly advise against beta-blocker use during acute advanced life support (PMID: 33773835)
- Clinical Consensus: International agreement on avoiding beta-blockade in acute resuscitation phases
📊 Conflicting Observational Evidence
- Miraglia et al., 2020 (Systematic Review): Found observational studies suggested esmolol was associated with improved ROSC and survival, but concluded evidence was of 'very low' quality and inconclusive (PMID: 32777667)
- Stupca et al., 2023: Retrospective analysis suggested esmolol may improve ROSC rates, but limited by historical controls and selection bias (PMID: 36436299)
- Driver et al., 2014: Single-center retrospective study hinted at potential benefit but acknowledged significant methodological limitations (PMID: 25033747)
- Driver et al., 2022: Demonstrated prehospital esmolol administration is feasible but provided no efficacy data (PMID: 35387498)
🎯 Meta-Analysis Context
- McLeod et al., 2017: Large network meta-analysis found no antiarrhythmic agent, including beta-blockers, significantly improves survival to hospital discharge in OHCA, providing broader context for negative findings (PMID: 29037886)
- Evidence Hierarchy: The Gelbenegger study represents the highest quality evidence to date - a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
🧩 Evidence Integration
This rigorous, prospective data provides the strongest evidence to date and definitively cautions against routine use of beta-blockade during active resuscitation for refractory VF, resolving the uncertainty created by lower-quality observational studies.
⚕️ Clinical Implications & Practice Recommendations
- Immediate Practice: Do not use beta-blockers such as landiolol for refractory VF during active resuscitation based on current high-quality evidence
- Standard Care: Follow established guideline recommendations emphasizing epinephrine and amiodarone as evidence-based interventions
- Safety Monitoring: Be vigilant for adverse events if beta-blockers are considered experimentally or off-label in specialized contexts
- Quality Improvement: Use this evidence to update institutional protocols and training programs
🧠 Knowledge Check Preview
Sample question from the full course assessment:
"Based on the Gelbenegger et al. trial, what is the most appropriate clinical action regarding landiolol use in refractory VF?"
Complete the full course to access interactive assessments and earn CE credits
✅ Clinical Bottom Line
Landiolol does not improve return of spontaneous circulation in refractory VF after OHCA and may increase asystole risk, providing definitive evidence supporting guideline recommendations against beta-blocker use in acute resuscitation settings.
📧 Daily Email Format
Mobile-optimized, comprehensive content delivered to your inbox

Daily Literature Update
Landiolol for refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
Gelbenegger G, Jilma B, Horvath LC, et al. Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110273-. PMID: 38866231.
Introduction
Refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is life-threatening with limited treatment success. This trial assessed if landiolol could improve outcomes as an add-on to standard care.
Study Design
Study Type: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
Population: 36 patients with refractory VF after OHCA
Intervention: 20 mg bolus infusion of landiolol vs placebo
Primary Outcome: Time to sustained ROSC
Safety Endpoints: Incidence of bradycardia and asystole
- Primary Outcome: No difference in median time to sustained ROSC: 39 min (landiolol) vs 41 min (placebo)
- Efficacy Concern: Sustained ROSC rate lower with landiolol (36.8%) than placebo (64.7%)
- Safety Signal: Asystole occurred significantly more in landiolol group (36.8%) vs none in placebo
Context & Related Research
- Panchal et al., 2020 (AHA Guidelines): Do not recommend beta-blockers for refractory VF resuscitation, supporting current standard care
- Soar et al., 2021 (ERC Guidelines): European guidelines also advise against beta-blocker use during advanced life support (PMID: 33773835)
- McLeod et al., 2017: Network meta-analysis found no antiarrhythmic improves survival to discharge in OHCA (PMID: 29037886)
- Miraglia et al., 2020: Systematic review found observational esmolol data of 'very low' quality and inconclusive (PMID: 32777667)
- Driver et al., 2014 & Stupca et al., 2023: Retrospective studies suggested potential esmolol benefit but limited by design (PMID: 25033747, 36436299)
Clinical Implications
- Do not use beta-blockers such as landiolol for refractory VF during active resuscitation
- Follow guidelines emphasizing epinephrine and amiodarone as standard care
- Monitor for adverse events if beta-blockers considered experimentally
- Update protocols based on this high-quality evidence
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths | Limitations |
---|---|
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design | Small sample size limits power and generalizability |
Focused on clinically relevant refractory VF population | Pilot study requiring confirmation in larger trials |
Clear safety signal identified | Limited to single beta-blocker agent (landiolol) |
🎧 AI Audio Overview
Quick AI-generated summary of today's highlight (5 minutes)
Clinical Bottom Line
Landiolol does not improve return of spontaneous circulation in refractory VF after OHCA and may increase asystole risk, supporting guideline recommendations against beta-blocker use in this setting.
Citations
- Gelbenegger G, Jilma B, Horvath LC, et al. Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110273-. PMID: 38866231
- Panchal et al., 2020 (AHA Guidelines)
- Soar et al., 2021 (PMID: 33773835)
- McLeod et al., 2017 (PMID: 29037886)
- Miraglia et al., 2020 (PMID: 32777667)
- Driver et al., 2014 (PMID: 25033747)
- Stupca et al., 2023 (PMID: 36436299)
🎧 5-Minute AI Audio Overview
AI-generated summary of today's literature highlight
Perfect for listening during commutes, workouts, or breaks between patients
Simple, Transparent Pricing
Monthly Subscription
- Daily literature updates
- 5-minute audio overviews
- ACPE CE course (3-5 hrs monthly)
- Specialty-focused content
- Mobile-friendly format
- Cancel anytime
Choose Your Track:
Annual Subscription
- All monthly features included
- 38% savings over monthly
- Priority support
- Early access to new tracks
- Bonus ACPE CE opportunities
- Switch tracks anytime
Choose Your Track:
All plans include a 7-day free trial. Cancel anytime. No hidden fees.
What Healthcare Professionals Say
"PACULit delivers exactly what I need - clinically relevant updates without the time burden. The summaries are perfectly tailored to what actually impacts my practice."
- Ryan Watts, PharmD, BCPS
"The specialty pharmacy track is a game-changer. Finally, literature updates that understand the complexity of high-cost, high-touch therapies. It's incredibly convenient to get this level of curation."
- Keia Pruitt, PharmD
"As an oncologist, staying current is critical but time-consuming. PACULit's oncology track delivers the most relevant studies with clear clinical implications - exactly what I need between patient visits."
- Jerel David, MD
"Pediatric-specific evidence is often buried in general literature. PACULit's pediatrics track saves me hours by curating what actually matters for my young patients. The convenience factor is huge."
- Kevin Allen Jr, MD
Ready to Transform Your Literature Consumption?
Join thousands of healthcare professionals staying current with PACULit
Start Your Free Week Today