High-Dose Nitroglycerin for Sympathetic Crashing Acute Pulmonary Edema

High-Dose Nitroglycerin for Sympathetic Crashing Acute Pulmonary Edema (SCAPE)

Pharmacy Friday Pearl – Pharmacy & Acute Care University

Download PDF

Introduction

  • SCAPE is a form of hypertensive heart failure triggered by a surge in catecholamines.
  • The result is pulmonary capillary leakage and alveolar flooding.
  • Management includes non-invasive ventilation and pharmacologic agents such as nitroglycerin.
  • Dose-dependent afterload reduction with nitroglycerin requires doses >50–150 mcg/min.

Pharmacology of Nitroglycerin (NTG)

Parameter Details
Mechanism of Action Organic nitrate vasodilator that reduces tension on vascular smooth muscle and dilates peripheral veins and arteries (at higher doses).
Dose • Chest pain: 5–400 mcg/min (starting at 5 mcg/min)
• Pulmonary edema/afterload reduction: 50–400 mcg/min
Titrate to symptom improvement and tolerated blood pressure
Administration • IV infusion: 50–400 mcg/min until symptom resolution
• IV bolus: 400–2000 mcg over 2–5 min (check hospital policy)
• Sublingual: 400 mcg tab, 2–4 tablets (≈160–320 mcg/min IV)
• Ointment: slow onset 30–60 min
PK/PD • Onset: IV 1–5 min; SL 1–3 min
• Peak: 3–15 min
• Duration: IV 5–10 min; SL 10–60 min
• Elimination: 22% renal
Adverse Effects Headache, hypotension, syncope, rebound hypertension, tolerance with prolonged use (~24 hrs)
Warnings/Interactions • PDE inhibitors
• Aortic stenosis, preload-dependent cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, hypotension at any time
Compatibility Incompatible with levofloxacin, SMX-TMP, daptomycin, and phenytoin

Clinical pearl: Higher doses of IV or bolus nitroglycerin may reduce ICU admissions and intubation risk in SCAPE.

Overview of Key Evidence

Author/Year Design (n) Intervention & Comparison Key Findings
Patrick, 2020 Observational (n=48) IV NTG 1 mg bolus by EMS ↓SBP by 31 mmHg, ↓HR by 10 bpm, ↑O2 from 86% to 98%; 2% symptomatic hypotension
Hsieh, 2018 Case Report (n=3) SL NTG 0.6 mg x 3, IV NTG bolus 1 mg Q2 min, then infusion 40 mcg/min Normalized respiratory status, avoided intubation & ICU admission
Paone, 2018 Case Report (n=1) IV NTG 400 mcg/min titrated Symptom resolution at 6 minutes
Wilson, 2016 Observational (n=395) IV NTG bolus (500–2000 mcg) Q3–5 min vs infusion vs both ↓ICU admissions, shorter LOS, no increase in intubations
Levy, 2007 Observational (n=29) IV NTG bolus 2 mg IV Q3 min ↓Intubation, ↓BiPAP/ICU admission
Sharon, 2000 RCT (n=40) IV isosorbide bolus 4 mg Q4 min vs infusion + BiPAP ↓Intubation, MI, mortality; ↑PaO₂
Cotter, 1998 RCT (n=104) IV isosorbide bolus 3 mg Q5 min + furosemide vs infusion titration ↓MV & MI, ↑PaO₂, fewer adverse effects

Clinical Conclusions

  • High-dose nitroglycerin (bolus and/or infusion) is effective in rapidly reducing preload and afterload in SCAPE.
  • Doses of ≥400 mcg/min (or equivalent bolus) are supported by case reports and observational studies.
  • High-dose IV or sublingual NTG has been associated with improved respiratory status, fewer ICU admissions, and reduced need for intubation.
  • Symptomatic hypotension is rare but monitoring is necessary, especially with bolus regimens.
  • Bolus dosing strategies may outperform continuous infusions in acute SCAPE decompensation.

Full Reference List

  1. Nitroglycerin. Micromedex [Electronic version]. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Retrieved March 5, 2020, from http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/
  2. Kramer K. Am Heart J. 2000;140:451–5.
  3. Agrawal N. Crit Care Med. 2016;20:39–43.
  4. Mebazaa A. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:544–58.
  5. Viau DM. Heart. 2015;101:1861–7.
  6. McMurray JJ. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:803–69.
  7. López-Rivera F. Am J Case Rep. 2019 Jan 21;20:83–90.
  8. Clemency BM. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Oct;28(5):477–81.
  9. Yancy CW. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147–239.
  10. Hsieh Y. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):34–36.
  11. Wilson SS. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(1):126–31.
  12. Levy P. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:144–52.
  13. Sharon A. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):832–7.
  14. Cotter G. Lancet. 1998;351(9100):389–93.
  15. Paone S. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(8):1526.e5–1526.e7.
  16. Patrick C. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Jan 27:1–7.

The Use of Norepinephrine vs Epinephrine in Post Cardiac Arrest Shock

The Use of Norepinephrine vs Epinephrine in Post Cardiac Arrest Shock

Pharmacy Friday Pearl – Pharmacy & Acute Care University

Download PDF

Introduction

  • The effects of epinephrine on animal hemodynamics have been studied since the late 1800s with recent concern regarding deleterious complications with cerebral and myocardial oxygen supply.
  • Recently, norepinephrine has been considered post cardiac arrest to minimize complications associated with epinephrine.

Pharmacology of Epinephrine and Norepinephrine

Category Epinephrine Norepinephrine
Dose Weight-based: 0.01–1 mcg/kg/min
Non-weight-based: 1–80 mcg/min
Institutional infusion rates may vary
Weight-based: 0.05–1 mcg/kg/min (initiate at 0.05–0.15)
Non-weight-based: 5–80 mcg/min (initiate at 5–15)
Institutional infusion rates may vary
Pharmacokinetics Onset: Immediate
Distribution: 1–2 min to peak
Metabolism: hepatic
Elimination: urine (inactive metabolites)
Half-life: <5 min
Onset: Immediate
Distribution: 1–2 min to peak
Metabolism: hepatic
Elimination: urine (inactive metabolites)
Half-life: <5 min
Adverse Effects Tachyarrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, extravasation leading to necrosis
Mechanism of Action α agonist → Peripheral vasoconstriction → ↑ myocardial & cerebral blood flow
β agonist → ↑ heart rate & contractility → ↑ myocardial oxygen demand
Compatibility Refer to institutional policies for line compatibility and Y-site administration.

Clinical pearl: Norepinephrine may offer a hemodynamic advantage over epinephrine in certain post-arrest scenarios.

Overview of Key Evidence

Author/Year Design (n) Key Findings
Bougouin, 2022 Retrospective (N=766) Epinephrine group had higher all-cause hospital mortality (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.4–4.7; P=0.002) and more CPC 3–5 at discharge.
Weiss, 2021 Retrospective (N=93) EPI group had more refractory hypotension, rearrest, or death in ED (50% vs 22.2%; P=0.008); adjusted odds of adverse events 3.94 times higher (P=0.013).
Mion, 2014 Case report (N=1) After recurrent VF with epinephrine, transition to norepinephrine led to ROSC and full recovery post ICU stay.
Kim, 2012 Retrospective (N=90) Survivors were more likely to have received norepinephrine (34.8% vs 22.6%); even more pronounced in prolonged arrest group (42.85% vs 25%).

Clinical Conclusions

  • It remains controversial whether epinephrine is the preferred vasopressor post-cardiac arrest.
  • Norepinephrine is a reasonable alternative post-arrest, particularly when adverse effects from epinephrine are of concern.

Full Reference List

  1. Micromedex [Electronic version]. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Accessed 2022, March 15. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/
  2. Callaway C. Epinephrine for cardiac arrest. Current Opinion in Cardiology. 2013;28(1):36-42.
  3. Epinephrine [package insert] Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2019.
  4. Kim et al. THE BENEFIT OF NOREPINEPHRINE INFUSION FOR HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT FOLLOWING CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST AND RESUSCITATION. Critical Care Medicine. 2012;40(12):1-328.
  5. Mion G, et al. Cardiac arrest: should we consider norepinephrine instead of epinephrine? Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(12):1560.e1-2. PMID: 24997106.
  6. Weiss A, et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Initial Norepinephrine or Epinephrine for Hemodynamic Support After Return of Spontaneous Circulation. Shock. 2021;56(6):988-993. PMID: 34172611.
  7. Bougouin W, et al. Epinephrine versus norepinephrine in cardiac arrest patients with post-resuscitation shock. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(3):300-310. PMID: 35129643.

Procainamide for Wide Complex Tachycardia

Procainamide for Wide Complex Tachycardia

Pharmacy Friday Pearl – Pharmacy & Acute Care University

Download PDF

Introduction

  • Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an uncommon but dangerous medical condition with an extremely variable clinical presentation.
  • Intravenous procainamide is guideline recommended and is the drug of choice for hemodynamically stable VT with a class IIa recommendation.
  • Procainamide is an old drug with new evidence supporting its use, but dosing strategies and administration techniques make it difficult to use at the bedside.

Procainamide

Parameter Details
Bolus Dose 10–17 mg/kg over 20–60 minutes (Max dose 1g, max rate 20–50 mg/min) OR 100 mg every 5 minutes (max rate 50 mg/min) up to 1g
Renal Adjustments eCrCl 10–50 ml/min: reduce dose by 25–50%
eCrCl <10 ml/min: reduce dose by 50–75%
Maintenance Infusion 1–6 mg/min
Mechanism Class 1A anti-arrhythmic; blocks fast sodium channels, prolongs action potential, reduces impulse conduction speed
PK/PD IV Onset: <2 min; IM: 10–30 min
IV Peak: 25–60 min; IM: 15–60 min
Duration: 3–4 hrs
Metabolism: Hepatic to active NAPA
Half-life: 2.5–4.7 hrs (NAPA: 7 hrs)
Excretion: 40–70% renally unchanged
Adverse Effects Hypotension, hepatotoxicity, lupus-like syndrome, positive ANA, anaphylaxis (sulfite), MG exacerbation, angioedema
Drug Interactions Interacts with diazepam, diltiazem, milrinone, phenytoin, hydralazine
Compatibility Compatible: 0.9% NaCl, 0.45% NaCl
Incompatible: D5 (variable), LR, D5NS

Clinical Pearl: Define institutional dosing and administration policies due to variable strategies in the literature and risk of adverse events.

Overview of Key Evidence

Author/Year Design (n) Key Findings
Ortiz, 2017 RCT (n=62) Procainamide: 67% VT termination; 9% major cardiac adverse
Amiodarone: 38% VT termination; 41% adverse
Marill, 2010 Multicenter cohort (n=187) VT termination: Amio 25%, Procainamide 30%
Komura, 2010 Retrospective (n=90) Procainamide terminated 75.7% VT vs. Lidocaine 35%
Marill, 2006 Case series (n=33) Amio VT termination: 29%; 6% needed cardioversion
Gorgels, 1996 Randomized (n=79) Procainamide terminated 79% VT vs. Lidocaine 19% (p<0.001)
Callans, 1992 Observational (n=15) VT termination rate 93% with median 600 mg procainamide

Clinical Conclusions

  • Procainamide is guideline-supported for stable VT (Class IIa).
  • Use empiric 10–17 mg/kg bolus dosing up to 1g.
  • Consider renal function for bolus dose reductions.
  • Initiate maintenance infusion at 1–6 mg/min after bolus.
  • Clearly define hospital protocols to avoid variability.

Full Reference List

  1. Procainamide. Micromedex [Electronic version]. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/
  2. Long B, Koyfman A. Best Clinical Practice: Emergency Medicine Management of Stable Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. J Emerg Med. 2017;52:484-492.
  3. Ortiz M, Martín A, Arribas F, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(17):1329-1335.
  4. Marill KA, deSouza IS, Nishijima DK, et al. Amiodarone or procainamide for the termination of sustained stable ventricular tachycardia: an historical multicenter comparison. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(3):297-306.
  5. Komura S, Chinushi M, Furushima H, et al. Efficacy of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ J. 2010;74(5):864-869.
  6. Marill KA, deSouza IS, Nishijima DK, et al. Amiodarone is poorly effective for the acute termination of ventricular tachycardia. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(3):217-224.
  7. Gorgels AP, van den Dool A, Hofs A, et al. Comparison of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(1):43-46.
  8. Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Dissociation of termination and prevention of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia with infusion of procainamide: evidence for distinct mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(1):111-117.
  9. Wellens HJ, Bär FW, Lie KI, et al. Effect of procainamide, propranolol and verapamil on mechanism of tachycardia in patients with chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1977;40(4):579-585.
```

PACULit Newsletter July 2025 (3 of 4)

PACULit Newsletter - July 2025

High-Impact Studies Review — July 2025 (3/4)

Stay updated with breakthrough research in emergency medicine, critical care, and advanced therapeutics.

Featured Educational Video

In this clinical dive from PACUPod, we explore three timely studies changing how we approach critical care, sepsis, and cardiac arrest. First up, we examine a bold randomized trial testing whether ultra-high doses of esomeprazole can reduce inflammation in septic patients. Despite the pharmacologic promise, the results show no reduction in organ dysfunction or inflammatory markers—reminding us that more isn't always better. Next, we break down the hemodynamic physiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the AMCPR trial. This study reveals that diastolic blood pressure, more than ETCO₂, strongly predicts return of spontaneous circulation—spotlighting real-time metrics that may guide resuscitation strategies in the field. Finally, we look at whether adding lactate to the qSOFA score (LqSOFA) enhances risk stratification for septic patients in the ED. The answer? A solid yes, with better sensitivity for identifying patients who will need ICU care, vasopressors, or who are at risk of death—though specificity takes a small hit. These are insights you can use on your next shift—evidence-based, fast-paced, and practice-changing.

1. A Multinational Randomized Trial of Mega-Dose Esomeprazole As Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Sepsis
Critical Care Medicine | 2025

This double-blind trial enrolled 307 adults with sepsis/septic shock across 17 ICUs/EDs, comparing 72 h of high-dose esomeprazole (1024 mg) versus placebo on organ-dysfunction outcomes.

Key Findings

  • No SOFA Improvement: Median mean daily SOFA to day 10 was identical (5; IQR 3-9 vs 3-8; p>0.99).
  • Neutral Secondary Outcomes: ICU-free days, antibiotic-free days, and 28-day mortality were unchanged.
  • Mechanistic Sub-Study: Ex vivo monocyte cytokine responses were unaffected, disputing an anti-inflammatory benefit.

Clinical Pharmacist's Perspective

High-dose PPI therapy should not be pursued for immunomodulation in sepsis; prioritize proven bundle elements (early antibiotics, source control) and reserve PPIs for GI bleeding prophylaxis.

Full Article
2. Diastolic Blood Pressure & End-Tidal CO₂ During CPR and Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of the AMCPR Trial
Resuscitation | 2025

Among 264 adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, investigators correlated early CPR hemodynamics with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Key Findings

  • DBP Predicts Success: Follow-up DBP >26.5 mmHg (≈10 min) yielded aOR 10.0 for sustained ROSC.
  • Delta DBP Matters: Raising DBP by >6.5 mmHg doubled ROSC likelihood (aOR 4.8).
  • ETCO₂ Less Informative: ETCO₂ values were largely similar between groups except at follow-up, indicating DBP is the stronger physiologic target.

Clinical Pharmacist's Perspective

Encourage teams to monitor DBP (e.g., arterial line or Doppler) and titrate compression quality/vasopressors to maintain >26 mmHg; stock ready-to-push epinephrine/norepinephrine to achieve perfusion pressures.

Full Article
3. Initial Lactate-Augmented qSOFA (LqSOFA) in Emergency Department Sepsis
American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2025

This retrospective cohort of 1,274 suspected sepsis patients compared LqSOFA (qSOFA+ initial lactate) against standard qSOFA for predicting ICU admission, vasopressor need, and 72-h mortality.

Key Findings

  • Higher Sensitivity: LqSOFA better identified patients needing ICU (48 % vs 30 %), pressors (68 % vs 50 %), and those who died (76 % vs 71 %).
  • Trade-Off in Specificity: Specificities were lower for LqSOFA (e.g., mortality 67 % vs 80 %).
  • Superior AUROC for Mortality: LqSOFA showed a statistically greater AUC for death prediction (p<0.05).

Clinical Pharmacist's Perspective

Advocate point-of-care lactate testing with triage; LqSOFA can flag high-risk patients sooner, but balance earlier escalation against false positives and resource strain.

Full Article
🔎 Final Takeaways:
  • No Benefit from Mega-Dose Esomeprazole: High-dose PPI therapy failed to improve organ dysfunction in sepsis—stick to guideline-directed care.
  • Target DBP >26 mmHg During CPR: Diastolic pressure outperforms ETCO₂ as a hemodynamic goal for ROSC in OHCA.
  • LqSOFA Beats qSOFA for Early Sepsis Risk: Adding lactate boosts sensitivity and AUROC, aiding rapid triage—accepting some loss of specificity.
Join Our Elite Community of Healthcare Professionals

Receive curated insights in acute care, pharmacy, and specialized medicine directly in your inbox.

📚
Evidence-Based Updates

Access peer-reviewed research summaries and clinical practice updates

🎙️
Expert Podcasts

Listen to discussions with leading practitioners on cutting-edge approaches

🎥
Video Content

Watch educational content, procedure demos, and case study analyses

Subscribe to PACULit