Introduction

  • Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an uncommon but dangerous medical condition, with an extremely variable clinical

    presentation.

  • Intravenous procainamide is guideline recommended and is the drug of choice for the treatment of hemodynamically

    stable VT with a class IIa recommendation.

  • Procainamide is an old drug with new evidence that supports it’s use but dosing strategies and administration techniques

    makes it difficult to use at the bedside.

Clinical Detail

    Procainamide

    Dose and

    administration

    Bolus Dosing

  • 10-17 mg/kg over 20-60 minutes (Max dose suggest 1g and max rate of 20-50 mg/min)

    or

  • 100 mg every 5 minutes at max rate of 50 mg/min to max dose 1g

    Renal Adjustments

  • eCrCl 10-50 ml/min: Reduce initial dosing by 25-50 %

  • eCrCL < 10 ml/min: Reduce initial dosing by 50-75%

    Maintenance Infusion Dosing

  • 1-6 mg/min

    Mechanism of

    Action

  • Class 1A anti-arrhythmic that binds to fast sodium channels inhibiting recovery after

    repolarization. It also prolongs the action potential and reduces the speed of impulse

    conduction

    PK/PD

  • Onset: IV <2 minutes; IM 10-30 minutes

  • Time to Peak: IV 25-60 minute; IM 15-60 minutes

  • Duration: IV/IM: 3-4 hours

  • Metabolism: Converted by the liver to N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), an active compound

  • Half-life: 2.5- 4.7 hr (NAPA- 7 hr); increased in renal impairment

  • Excretion: 40- 70% excreted unchanged by the kidneys

    Adverse Effects

  • Hypotension

  • Hepatotoxicity

Evidence

    Author,

    year

    Design/ sample size

    Intervention & Comparison

    Outcome

    Ortiz,

    2017

    Randomized

    controlled trial

    n= 62

  • IV procainamide 10 mg/kg over 20

    min

  • IV amiodarone 5mg/kg over 20 min

  • Major cardiac adverse occurred in 3 of 33

    (9%) procainamide and 12 of 29 (41%)

    amiodarone patients.

  • Tachycardia terminated within 40 min in 22

    (67%) procainamide and 11 (38%)

    amiodarone patients.

    Maril,

    2010

    Multicenter cohort

    study

    n= 187

  • IV Amiodarone 2 mg/kg infusion at

    a rate of at least 10 mg⁄ min

  • IV Procainamide 10 mg/kg infusion

    at a rate of at least 15 mg⁄ min

  • The rates of VT termination were 25% (13 ⁄

  • and 30% (9 ⁄ 30) for amiodarone and
  • procainamide, respectively.

    Komura,

    2010

    Retrospective analysis

    n= 90

Conclusions

    tachycardia. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(3):217-224. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.022

  • Gorgels AP, van den Dool A, Hofs A, et al. Comparison of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular

    tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(1):43-46. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00224-x

  • Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Dissociation of termination and prevention of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia with infusion of

    procainamide: evidence for distinct mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(1):111-117. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(92)90060-z

  • Wellens HJ, Bär FW, Lie KI, Düren DR, Dohmen HJ. Effect of procainamide, propranolol and verapamil on mechanism of tachycardia in

    patients with chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1977;40(4):579-585. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(77)90074-1

References

  • Procainamide. Micromedex [Electronic version].Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from

    http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/

  • Long B, Koyfman A. Best Clinical Practice: Emergency Medicine Management of Stable Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. J Emerg

    Med 2017;52:484-492.

  • Ortiz M, Martín A, Arribas F, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute

    treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(17):1329-1335. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw230

  • Marill KA, deSouza IS, Nishijima DK, et al. Amiodarone or procainamide for the termination of sustained stable ventricular tachycardia: an

    historical multicenter comparison. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(3):297-306. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00680.x

  • Komura S, Chinushi M, Furushima H, et al. Efficacy of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular

    tachycardia. Circ J. 2010;74(5):864-869. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-09-0932

  • Marill KA, deSouza IS, Nishijima DK, Stair TO, Setnik GS, Ruskin JN. Amiodarone is poorly effective for the acute termination of ventricular

    tachycardia. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(3):217-224. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.022

  • Gorgels AP, van den Dool A, Hofs A, et al. Comparison of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular

    tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(1):43-46. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00224-x

  • Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Dissociation of termination and prevention of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia with infusion of

    procainamide: evidence for distinct mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(1):111-117. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(92)90060-z

  • Wellens HJ, Bär FW, Lie KI, Düren DR, Dohmen HJ. Effect of procainamide, propranolol and verapamil on mechanism of tachycardia in

    patients with chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1977;40(4):579-585. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(77)90074-1

Tags:procainamide wide complex tachycardia ventricular tachycardia amiodarone