Introduction
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Hypertensive emergency is characterized by systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >
120 mmHg with evidence of target organ damage.
Rapid blood pressure lowering with intravenous antihypertensives is warranted to prevent further organ damage.
Patients presenting with intracranial hemorrhage, aortic dissection, preeclampsia, or pheochromocytoma crisis should
achieve target blood pressure within one hour of presentation.
Current literature lacks evidence of mortality benefit with any one antihypertensive drug. Selection of a medication should
consider target organ(s) affected, underlying disease states, and time to target blood pressure.
Treatment in Selected Co-Morbidities
Condition
BP Goal
Preferred Agents
Acute aortic dissection
SBP < 120 mmHg
within 20 min
Esmolol
Labetalol
Nicardipine
Nitroprusside
Pharmacology
First-line Agents Medication Class Onset Duration Dosing Clinical Pearls Nicardipine Ca channel blocker IV: 5-10 min IV: 2-6 hours Initial: 5 mg/hr Titration: 2.5 mg/hr every 15 min Maximum: 15 mg/hr No dose adjustments in elderly patients Esmolol Beta-blocker IV: 1-2 min IV: 10-20 min Bolus: 500-1,000 mcg/kg Initial: 50 mcg/kg/min Titration: repeat bolus dose, then increase by 50 mcg/kg/ min every 10 min Maximum: 200 mcg/kg/min Contraindications: - Bradycardia - Decompensated HF Labetalol Beta-blocker Alpha-1 antagonist IV: 2-5 min Peak: 5-15 min IV: 2-6 hours Peak: 18 hours Bolus: 10-20 mg IV push every 10 min IV infusion: 0.5 - 10 mg/min titrated 1-2 mg/min every 2 hours Maximum: 300 mg total Precaution: - Second-/third- degree heart block - Bradycardia - Heart failure Second-line Agents Phentolamine* Non-selective alpha antagonist IV: Seconds IV: 15 min Initial: 5 mg IV push May repeat every 10 min PRN Useful in cate- cholamine excess and clonidine withdrawal Nitroglycerin NO- dependent vasodilator IV: 2-5 min IV: 5-10 min ACS: Initial: 5 mcg/min Titration: 5 mcg/ min every 3-5 min Maximum: 20 mcg/min Pulmonary edema: Initial: 100-200 mcg/min
Evidence
Author (Title), Year Design Purpose Outcome Anderson (INTERACT), 2008 RCT (N=404) Comparison of BP goals (SBP < 140 vs SBP < 180) in patients with acute ICH - Mean hematoma expansion was smaller in the intensive group (13.7% vs 36.3%) - No difference in death or disability at 3 months (48% vs 49%) - Limitation: included patients with SBP > 150 mmHg, over 30% of patients were treated with oral antihypertensive therapy Quereshi (ATACH-2), 2016 RCT (N=1,000) Comparison of BP goals (SBP 110-139 vs SBP 179-140) in patients with acute ICH - All patients received nicardipine infusion - No difference between death or disability at 3 months (38.7% vs 37.7%) - Increased renal adverse events within 24 hours in the intensive group (9.0% vs 4.0%) - Limitation: mean SBP differed by only 10 mmHg between groups 2 hours post-randomization (129 mmHg vs 141 mmHg) Peacock (CLUE), 2011 RCT (N=226) Nicardipine IV infusion versus labetalol IV bolus for management of hypertensive emergency - Patients receiving nicardipine were more likely to reach target BP within 30 min (91.7% vs 82.5%) - Rescue antihypertensive use did not differ significantly between groups within first 6 hours - Limitation: only 63.3% of patients had evidence of target organ damage at randomization Yang, 2004 Prospective cohort (N=40) Nitroprusside IV versus nicardipine IV for hypertensive emergency with pulmonary edema - No significant difference between blood pressure readings across groups at any time point - No adverse events reported in either group - Limitation: nicardipine dosing started at 3 mcg/kg/min (12.5 mg/hr in a 70 kg patient)
Conclusions
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Selection of a first-line antihypertensive should consider compelling indications and acute blood pressure goals, as robust
literature comparing long-term outcomes across drug classes is lacking for most indications.
Nicardipine may provide more consistent blood pressure control than labetalol. This is particularly important in patients
with acute stroke, as large fluctuations in blood pressure are believed to negatively impact cerebral perfusion.
Aggressive lowering of SBP less than 140 mmHg in patients with acute ICH has not been shown to improve long-term
outcomes and may negatively impact renal perfusion.
Nicardipine has been shown to provide similar blood pressure control to nitroprusside. In patients with acute ICH,
nitroprusside use within 24-hours of presentation was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
References
1. Whelton, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. J Amer Heart Assoc 2018;71(6):e13-e115. 2. Benken ST. Hypertensive emergencies. CCSAP 2018;1:7-30. 3. Anderson, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:391-9. 4. Quereshi, et al. Intensive blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. New Engl J Med 2016;375(11):1033-43. 5. Peacock WF, et al. CLUE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus labetalol use in the emergency department. Critical Care 2011;15(R157):1-8. 6. Yang HJ, Kim JG, Lim YS, et al. Nicardipine versus nitroprusside infusion as antihypertensive therapy in hypertensive emergencies. J Int Med Res 2004;32:118-23.
Source PDF
HTN Emergency FINAL 12.17.20.pdfA short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. We tag this signup for Pharmacy Friday Pearls in Mailchimp and mirror it to Brevo List 6 when the subscriber record syncs.
Get the Friday Pearl email
Get a short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. No spam.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.