Introduction

  • Around 9,000 Americans are treated for snake bites and 5 die each year. Most are bitten by members of the Crotalinae subfamily (a.k.a.

    crotalids) of the pit viper family which includes copperheads, water moccasins, and rattlesnakes.

  • Crotalid envenomation’s can cause broad range of adverse effects, including local tissue, hematologic, and/or systemic effects

    including shock and life-threatening bleeding.

  • Use symptom progression such as swelling beyond 1 major joint or hematologic effects (decreased fibrinogen, thrombocytopenia, or

    increased PT) as an indicator for initial or additional doses of antivenom. Identification of the snake can be helpful but should not

    determine decision to initiate or continue therapy in place of symptom progression.

  • Patients can develop delayed or recurrent hematologic symptoms up to a week after treatment cessation, especially following a severe

    envenomation.

Clinical Detail

    Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine)

    (Crofab®)

    Crotalidae Immune F(ab’)2 (Equine)

    (Anavip®)

    Mechanism of

    Action

    Fab fragment of IgG antibody isolated from sheep

    serum; antibody binds to venom and removes it from

    tissue

    F(ab’)2 fragment of IgG antibody isolated from horse serum;

    antibody binds to venom and removes it from tissue

    Dose

  • Initial Dose

    o

    Progressing tissue/hematologic effects: 4 – 6

    vials

    o

    Systemic effects including shock: 8 – 12 vials

    May repeat every hour as

    needed until initial control of

    local, hematological, and

    systemic symptoms is achieved

  • Maintenance: 2 vials q6h x 3 after control is

    achieve

  • Initial dose: 10 vials

    o

    May repeat every hour as needed until initial

    control of local, hematological, and systemic

    symptoms is achieved

  • Maintenance: 4 vials as needed; may administer for any

    re-emerging symptoms

    Administration

  • Inject >=18 mL NS (or SWFI) into each vial; more

    volume will speed up dissolution

  • Gently swirl or roll vials in hand or combine all vials

Evidence

    Author, year Design/ sample size

    Intervention & Comparison

    Outcome

    Dart RC,

    1997

    Prospective, multicenter trial

    (n = 11)

    Patients received 4 vials of Crofab® for

    initial control of symptoms following

    minimal or moderate crotalid

    envenomation

    Ten of 11 patients were deemed to

    have a clinical response and

    reduction in snakebite severity score;

    one patient required 4 addition vials

    Dart RC,

    2001

    Multicenter, randomized,

    prospective, open-label trial

    (n = 31)

    Initial 6 vials of Crofab® patients were

    randomized to receive either 2 vials

    PRN vs 2 vials Q6h x 18 hours

    No statistical difference between

    groups in snakebite severity score;

    Overall severity was reduced from

  • 35 to 2.39 (p < 0.001)
  • Boyer LV,

    2013

    Phase 2, RCT for rattlesnake

    bites in Tuscon, AZ

    (n = 12)

    Crofab® vs Anavip® for reduction in

    serum venom levels at various pre-

    defined times following crotalid

    envenomation

    Venom levels were insignificantly

    lower following initial control in the

    Crofab® group, but significantly lower

    following maintenance and during

    follow-up in the Anavip® group (p =

  • 004);

Conclusions

  • Crofab® and Anavip® seem to be comparable for initial symptom control, although due to the longer half-life,

    Anavip® may have a larger role in prevention of late-onset or recurrent coagulopathy.

  • Each health-system will likely need to make a formulary decision on which agent to use. This decision should

    be based on which snake species are endemic to that region, preparation time, agent costs, and the

    prevalence of recurring coagulopathy in their patient population.

    Overview of Evidence

    Author, year Design/ sample size

    Intervention & Comparison

    Outcome

    Dart RC,

    1997

    Prospective, multicenter trial

    (n = 11)

    Patients received 4 vials of Crofab® for

    initial control of symptoms following

    minimal or moderate crotalid

    envenomation

    Ten of 11 patients were deemed to

References

  • Lavonas et al. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11:2.

  • Cocchio C, et alAm J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(3):175-187.

  • Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune FAB (Ovine). Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Riverwoods, IL. Available

    at: http://online.lexi.com. Accessed April 28, 2020.

  • Crofab® [package insert]. West Conshohocken, PA: BTG International Inc; 2000.

  • Crotalidae Immune F(ab’)2 (Equine). Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Riverwoods, IL. Available at:

    http://online.lexi.com. Accessed April 28, 2020.

  • Anavip® [package insert]. Franklin, TN: Instituto Bioclon, S.A. de C.V.; 2015.

  • Dart RC, et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(1):33-9.

  • Dart RC, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(16):2030-6.

  • Boyer LV, et al. Toxicon. 2013;74:101-8.

  • Bush SP, et al. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53(1):37-45.
  • Gerardo CJ, et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(2):233-244.e3.
  • Gerardo CJ, Keyler DE, Rapp-Olsson AM, Schwarz J III, Dart RC. Post Hoc Analysis of the RCT Comparing F(ab’)2 to Fab Antivenom:
  • Control of Venom-Induced Tissue Injury in Copperhead Snakebite Patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine 76(4) Supp:S29Dec;26(4):472-

Tags:crotalid snake bite antivenom envenomation