Introduction
- Nausea is a protective mechanism to warn the body of potential toxin ingestion; it may occur with or without emesis.
- A common presenting complaint in emergency departments.
- No widely accepted evidence-based guideline to optimize the use of antiemetic medications for N/V in the adult ED setting.
- A broad list of possible causes; unique etiologies include cannabinoid hyperemesis and hyperemesis gravidarum of pregnancy.
- Complex pathophysiology involving CNS, ANS, gastric dysrhythmias, and the endocrine system.
Clinical Detail
Ondansetron
(5HT-3)
Metoclopramide
(D2, 5HT-3)
Prochlorperazine
(D2, M1, H1)
Promethazine
(D2, M1, H1)
Haloperidol
(D2)
Droperidol
(D2)
Dose
Oral, IM, IV: 4-8 mg
as a single dose
IV: 10-20 mg as a
single dose
PO: 10 mg as a
single dose
PO: 5-10 mg
IM: 5-10 mg;
IV: 2.5-10 mg
PR: 25 mg
Oral, IM, IV,
rectal: 12.5 – 25
mg
IV/IM, PO: 0.5-2
mg
IV/IM: 1.25-2.5 mg
Administration
via IV push
IV: <=10 mg
can be given
IVP over 1-2
min; give
doses >10
mg over at
least 10 min
IV: max rate
Evidence
Author, year
Design/ sample
size
Intervention & Comparison
Outcome
April, 2018
RCT (n=122)
Inhaled isopropyl alcohol + ondansetron PO
inhaled isopropyl alcohol + placebo PO
inhaled placebo + ondansetron PO
Mean decrease in nausea VAS score was 30 mm
(95% CI 22-37 mm) for group A, 32 mm (95% CI
25-39 mm) for group B, and 9 mm (95% CI 5-14
mm) for group C
No adverse events were reported in either arm
Aromatherapy with or without PO ondansetron
provided greater relief than PO ondansetron
alone
Meek, 2018
RCT (n=215)
Efficacy of droperidol (1.25 mg IV) vs
ondansetron (8 mg IV) vs 0.9% saline
placebo for adult ED nausea
Symptom improvement occurred in 75% (95% CI
64-85%) of droperidol participants, 80% (95% CI
69-89%) for ondansetron, and 76% (95% CI 64-
85%) for placebo
Mean VAS score changes were -29 mm (95% CI –
36 to -23mm) in droperidol, -34 mm (95% CI -41
to -28 mm) in ondansetron, and -24 mm (95% CI –
29 to -19 mm) in placebo
Superiority was not demonstrated for droperidol
or ondansetron vs placebo
Parker, 2018
Retrospective
review (n=35,824)
Conclusions
(Amir Haddad & [email protected]
Antiemetic agents studied in the ED setting include ondansetron, promethazine, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, and
droperidol.
Clinicians should Optimize therapy based on efficacy, side effect profile, patient’s preference, and cost in selection of
agent.
May utilize IV Benadryl for EPS prevention of agents.
References
- Micromedex [Electronic version].Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Retrieved Febuary 1, 2021, from
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26411330/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18304050/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29995744/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24818542/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29449262/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29463461/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28987314/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30368981/
http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/
Source PDF
NV-DRAFT. edit jlp4.pdfA short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. We tag this signup for Pharmacy Friday Pearls in Mailchimp and mirror it to Brevo List 6 when the subscriber record syncs.
Get the Friday Pearl email
Get a short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. No spam.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.