Introduction

  • Nausea is a protective mechanism to warn the body of potential toxin ingestion; it may occur with or without emesis.
  • A common presenting complaint in emergency departments.
  • No widely accepted evidence-based guideline to optimize the use of antiemetic medications for N/V in the adult ED setting.
  • A broad list of possible causes; unique etiologies include cannabinoid hyperemesis and hyperemesis gravidarum of pregnancy.
  • Complex pathophysiology involving CNS, ANS, gastric dysrhythmias, and the endocrine system.

Clinical Detail

    Ondansetron

    (5HT-3)

    Metoclopramide

    (D2, 5HT-3)

    Prochlorperazine

    (D2, M1, H1)

    Promethazine

    (D2, M1, H1)

    Haloperidol

    (D2)

    Droperidol

    (D2)

    Dose

    Oral, IM, IV: 4-8 mg

    as a single dose

    IV: 10-20 mg as a

    single dose

    PO: 10 mg as a

    single dose

    PO: 5-10 mg

    IM: 5-10 mg;

    IV: 2.5-10 mg

    PR: 25 mg

    Oral, IM, IV,

    rectal: 12.5 – 25

    mg

    IV/IM, PO: 0.5-2

    mg

    IV/IM: 1.25-2.5 mg

    Administration

  • via IV push

  • IV: <=10 mg

    can be given

    IVP over 1-2

    min; give

    doses >10

    mg over at

    least 10 min

  • IV: max rate

Evidence

    Author, year

    Design/ sample

    size

    Intervention & Comparison

    Outcome

    April, 2018

    RCT (n=122)

    Inhaled isopropyl alcohol + ondansetron PO

    inhaled isopropyl alcohol + placebo PO

    inhaled placebo + ondansetron PO

  • Mean decrease in nausea VAS score was 30 mm

    (95% CI 22-37 mm) for group A, 32 mm (95% CI

    25-39 mm) for group B, and 9 mm (95% CI 5-14

    mm) for group C

  • No adverse events were reported in either arm

  • Aromatherapy with or without PO ondansetron

    provided greater relief than PO ondansetron

    alone

    Meek, 2018

    RCT (n=215)

    Efficacy of droperidol (1.25 mg IV) vs

    ondansetron (8 mg IV) vs 0.9% saline

    placebo for adult ED nausea

  • Symptom improvement occurred in 75% (95% CI

    64-85%) of droperidol participants, 80% (95% CI

    69-89%) for ondansetron, and 76% (95% CI 64-

    85%) for placebo

  • Mean VAS score changes were -29 mm (95% CI –

    36 to -23mm) in droperidol, -34 mm (95% CI -41

    to -28 mm) in ondansetron, and -24 mm (95% CI –

    29 to -19 mm) in placebo

  • Superiority was not demonstrated for droperidol

    or ondansetron vs placebo

    Parker, 2018

    Retrospective

    review (n=35,824)

Conclusions

    (Amir Haddad & [email protected]

  • Antiemetic agents studied in the ED setting include ondansetron, promethazine, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, and

    droperidol.

  • Clinicians should Optimize therapy based on efficacy, side effect profile, patient’s preference, and cost in selection of

    agent.

  • May utilize IV Benadryl for EPS prevention of agents.

References

  • Micromedex [Electronic version].Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Retrieved Febuary 1, 2021, from
  • http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/

  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26411330/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18304050/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29995744/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24818542/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29449262/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29463461/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28987314/
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30368981/
Tags:nausea vomiting antiemetics ondansetron