Introduction
- SVT indicates tachycardia with atrial rates >100 beats per minute
- Immediate direct-current (DC) cardioversion is indicated in hemodynamically unstable patients
- More options available for management of hemodynamically stable patients in SVT of unknown etiology
a. Traditionally excludes ventricular tachycardias and atrial fibrillation (AF)
b. Includes: atrial tachycardias, atrioventricular (AV) junctional tachycardias, and AV reentrant
tachycardias
a. First-line: vagal maneuvers
i. Valsalva maneuver or carotid sinus massage
b. Second-line (strength of recommendation varies by ACC and ESC)
i. Adenosine
ii. IV non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (i.e. diltiazem or verapamil)
iii. IV beta-blockers (i.e. esmolol or metoprolol)
Clinical Detail
- 25mg/kg
- 35 mg/kg IV in
- 5 to 5 mg
Adenosine
Diltiazem
Verapamil
Dose
6 mg x 1
o
Repeat 12mg q1-2min x2 if
no effect
Can use an initial 12 mg dose of
caffeine ingested within 4 hours
o
Repeat with
15 minutes if
needed
o
Repeat with 5-
10 mg IV
every 15-30
minutes
Administration
IV bolus as proximal to heart as
possible with stopcock or diluted in 20-
30 ml normal saline
Slow IV push over 2-5 mins
PK
Onset: 20-30 sec
Duration: 10-20 sec
Onset: ~3 min
Duration: 3-4 hours
Onset: 2-7 min
Duration: 2-5 hours
Adverse Effects
Dyspnea, chest tightness, dizziness,
headache, facial flushing, nausea,
“electric shock” sensation, transient
Evidence
Author, year
Design/
sample size
Intervention & Comparison
Outcome
Sternbach et
al. 1986
Observational;
n=11
IV diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg over 5 min
Conversion in 64% patients
Significant decreased in HR and decreased SBP of 12.4
mmHg
McCabe et
al. 1991
Observational;
n=37
IV adenosine 6 mg rapid push then
12 mg q2 min x2 if no effect
88% conversion in patients with SVT
Hood et al.
1992
Prospective,
crossover,
RCT; n=25
I1 = IV adenosine administered in
rapid 40 mcg/kg increments q2 min
up to 20 mg
I2 = IV verapamil at 70 mcg/kg
administered over 5 min and
repeated q5 min up to 15 mg
No significant difference in conversion
increased SBP after conversion with adenosine
No change in mean SBP after
conversion with verapamil
Gauche et
Conclusions
patients. The decrease in systolic blood pressure may not be much of a concern if patients are normotensive. There is
not enough evidence to recommend one agent over in the absence of contraindications to either age
References
Brugada et al. European Heart Journal. 2019;00:1-66
Page et al. Circulation. 2015;133:506-74
Adenosine [Lexi-drugs]
Diltiazem [Lexi-drugs]
McDowell et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):61-3
Sternbach et al. Clin Cardiol. 1986;9:145-49
McCabe et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):358-61
Hood et al. American Heart Journal. 1992;123:1543-49
Gausche et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24(2):183-89
Lim et al. Resuscitation. 2002;52:167-74
Lim et al. Resuscitation. 2009;80:523-28
Alabed et al. Cochrane Database. 2017;10:1-36
A short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. We tag this signup for Pharmacy Friday Pearls in Mailchimp and mirror it to Brevo List 6 when the subscriber record syncs.
Get the Friday Pearl email
Get a short weekly clinical Pearl for acute care pharmacists. No spam.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.