
Jimmy
PharmD

Jimmy
PharmD
| Dose | 0.3 mg/kg IV |
| Administration | IV push |
| Formulation* | 20 mg/ 10 ml 40 mg/ 20ml |
| PK/PD | Onset: ~20 seconds Duration: 4-10 minutes Metabolism: Hydrolysis of the ethylester side Renal Excretion: 75% |
| Adverse Effects | Injection site pain, nausea, vomiting, myoclonus |
| Drug Interactions | No major reactions |
| Compatibility | Incompatible with vitamin c and vecuronium |
| Comments | There is hypothetical concerns about adrenal insufficiency with a single dose. Hemodynamically neutral |
| Drug | Hemodynamic Effect | Comments |
| Etomidate | ↔ BP, ↔ CO, ↔ HR, ↓ cortisol , ↔ ICP | Prolonged inhibition of steroid synthesis in the critically ill; withdrawn from number of countries |
| Ketamine | ↑BP, ↑ HR, ↑ CO, ↔ cortisol, ↑↓ ICP | ↔ or ↑ CPP and ↔ ICP with standard anesthetic management |
| Propofol | ↓ BP, ↔ HR,↓ CO, ↔ cortisol, ↓ ICP | Hemodynamic compromise marked in elderly, ASA 3 or more or hypovolemic patients with ‘standard’ induction dose |
| Author, year | Design/ sample size | Intervention & Comparison | Outcome |
| Perier et al,2018 | Retrospective N=97 | Etomidate vs sodium thiopental for RSI in patients with convulsive status epilepticus | • Seizure and/or status epilepticus recurred in 13 (56%) patients in the etomidate group and 11 patients (44%) in the sodium thiopental group |
| Gabor,2006 | Retrospective N=30 | 1 mg/kg of propofol or 0.2 mg/kg of etomidate for electroconvulsive therapy | • After etomidate induction, seizure durations registered either by EEG or by EMG were longer than propofol treated cases. |
| Zuckerbraun et al, 2006 | Retrospective N=101 | Etomidate for RSI in general population | • There was no relationship between seizures after etomidate administration and prior seizure history (p = 0.25). |
| Guldner,2003 | Retrospective N=105 | Etomidate for RSI in general population | • Complications included three patients who vomited within 10 minutes of etomidate administration. There were no cases of documented myoclonus, status epilepticus, or new-onset seizures. |
| Reddy,1993 | Prospective randomized study N=68 | Etomidate, thiopental, methohexital or propofol for anesthesia induction | Spontanous movement (myoclonic, dystonic or tremor): Etomidate 86%, thiopental 16.6%, methohexital 12.5%, propofol 5.5% EEG activity: 2 patients receiving etomidate, no generalized epileptiform activity noted |
| Ebrahim, 1986 | Case reports N=12 | etomidate for anesthesia induction in patient with intractable seizures | Electroencephalograms were recorded by means of subdural electrodes. Nine of the 12 patients showed an increase in epileptiform activity. In six of the nine patients, the activity was marked. |
| Krieger,1985 | Letter to editor N=55 | Etomidate for anesthesia induction or to activate seizure focus | 25 patients had epilptiform activity associated with etomidate administration 6/30 patients had generalized epileptiform activity noted on EEG |
| Grant,1983 | Case series N=4 | Etomidate infusion for sedation in ICU | Generalized and focal seizures after variable periods of etomidate o EEGs were not evaluated at the time of suspected seizure activity. Patients were on infusion for 6-28 hours at onset of seizure activity. |
| Ghonrim,1977 | Prospective randomized study N=120 | Etomidate or thiopental for anesthesia induction | 28% etomidate vs. 0% thiopental had myoclonic movements 11% etomidate vs. 1% thiopental had tonic movements No epileptiform discharges were noted in 10 patients who had EEG monitoring |
Level Up Your Practice
Join thousands of pharmacy professionals learning with PACU.
Level Up Your Practice
Join thousands of pharmacy professionals learning with PACU.