Supportive Care in Hyperglycemic Crises

Supportive Care and Complication Management in Hyperglycemic Crises (DKA & HHS)

Objectives Icon A checkmark inside a circle, symbolizing achieved goals.

Lesson Objective

Recommend appropriate supportive care measures and monitoring to manage complications during treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS).

1. Organ Support Measures

Severe metabolic derangements in DKA/HHS may precipitate respiratory failure or hemodynamic collapse. Prompt recognition and targeted support maintain perfusion and oxygenation while metabolic therapy proceeds.

A. Respiratory Support

  • Indications for mechanical ventilation:
    • Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 or inability to protect airway
    • Refractory hypoxemia (PaO₂/FiO₂ <200) despite oxygen
    • Hypercapnia with pH <7.20 or respiratory muscle fatigue
  • Ventilator strategies:
    • Lung-protective settings: tidal volume 6 mL/kg predicted body weight; plateau pressure <30 cm H₂O; PEEP to recruit alveoli
    • Adjust minute ventilation to target pH 7.25–7.35; avoid excessive hyperventilation once metabolic acidosis resolves
    • Monitor arterial blood gases every 2–4 hours during the acute phase
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Airway Protection

Early elective intubation in obtunded patients prevents aspiration and subsequent worsened acidosis from aspiration pneumonitis.

B. Hemodynamic Support

  • Persistent hypotension (MAP <65 mmHg) after 30–60 mL/kg isotonic crystalloid indicates need for vasopressors.
  • First-line agent: norepinephrine 0.05–0.1 µg/kg/min, titrated to MAP ≥65 mmHg.
  • Adjunct: vasopressin 0.03 units/min to reduce catecholamine dose and support renal perfusion.
  • Monitoring:
    • Invasive arterial line for continuous pressure monitoring.
    • Lactate clearance and urine output >0.5 mL/kg/h as perfusion surrogates.
    • Echocardiographic assessment (e.g., stroke volume variation) in patients with cardiac comorbidity.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Vasopressor Use

Avoid excessive vasoconstriction; balance afterload support with the need to maintain adequate end-organ blood flow.

2. ICU-Related Prophylaxis

Hyperglycemic crises create prothrombotic, stress-ulcer, and infection risks. Standard ICU prophylaxis mitigates these complications and supports recovery.

A. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis

  • Agent: enoxaparin 40 mg SC once daily (if CrCl <30 mL/min: 30 mg SC once daily).
  • Consider Anti-Xa monitoring (target 0.2–0.5 IU/mL) in extremes of weight or severe renal dysfunction.
  • Contraindications: platelet count <50×10³/µL. Use intermittent pneumatic compression devices until platelets recover.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: VTE Risk in HHS

HHS carries a VTE risk comparable to that of severe sepsis due to profound dehydration and hyperosmolarity; routine prophylaxis is essential.

B. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

  • Options: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) like pantoprazole 40 mg IV daily, or an H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) like ranitidine 50 mg IV every 8 hours.
  • PPI Pros/Cons: Potent, prolonged acid suppression versus a potential increased risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia and C. difficile infection.
  • De-escalation: Discontinue prophylaxis when full enteral nutrition is established (typically within 48–72 hours).
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Choosing an Agent

Assess the individual patient’s risk of gastrointestinal bleeding versus their risk for nosocomial infections before choosing between a PPI and an H2RA.

C. Infection Prevention

  • Glycemic Target: Maintain blood glucose between 140–180 mg/dL using a validated insulin-infusion protocol; monitor glucose every 1–2 hours.
  • Central‐line Bundles: Adhere strictly to maximal barrier precautions, chlorhexidine skin prep, and daily review of line necessity.
  • Device Management: Remove unnecessary catheters and lines promptly to reduce the risk of device-associated infections.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Glycemic Control and Immunity

Maintaining moderate glycemic control (140-180 mg/dL) improves neutrophil function and has been shown to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections in critically ill patients.

3. Management of Iatrogenic Complications

Aggressive metabolic therapy can cause hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, fluid overload, and—rarely—cerebral edema. Vigilant monitoring and timely interventions prevent morbidity and mortality.

Flowchart for Managing Hypoglycemia and Hypokalemia A flowchart showing the decision-making process for treating iatrogenic hypoglycemia and hypokalemia during DKA/HHS management. It details glucose and potassium thresholds and corresponding actions. Monitor Glucose q1-2h (Target: 140-180 mg/dL) Glucose < 200 mg/dL? (DKA) or < 300 (HHS) YES Add Dextrose to IV Fluids (e.g., D5NS at 150 mL/h) NO Glucose < 70 mg/dL? (Hypoglycemia) YES Treat Hypoglycemia 25g D50W IV; reduce insulin Monitor Potassium q2-4h (Before & during insulin) Initial K⁺ < 3.3 mEq/L? YES HOLD INSULIN Replete K⁺ first NO K⁺ 3.3 – 5.2 mEq/L? (During therapy) YES Replete Prophylactically 20-40 mEq KCl per liter IV fluid
Figure 1: Iatrogenic Complication Management. This flowchart outlines key decision points for managing hypoglycemia and hypokalemia during DKA/HHS treatment, emphasizing preventative strategies and rapid intervention.

A. Hypoglycemia

  • Definition: Blood glucose <70 mg/dL (action threshold often <54 mg/dL).
  • Treatment:
    • Symptomatic or <70 mg/dL: 25 g IV dextrose (one ampule of D50W).
    • Asymptomatic <54 mg/dL: 10 g IV dextrose (e.g., 100 mL of D10W).
  • Infusion adjustments: Reduce insulin rate by 50% or temporarily hold until glucose is >100 mg/dL.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Preventing Rebound Hypoglycemia

Prevent rebound hypoglycemia by anticipating the short duration of action of IV D50W. Ensure dextrose-containing fluids are running and consider a proactive reduction in the insulin infusion rate after treatment.

B. Hypokalemia

  • Risk: Intracellular shift of potassium driven by insulin therapy, compounded by urinary losses from osmotic diuresis and dilution from volume resuscitation.
  • Monitoring: Serum potassium every 2–4 hours during the acute phase.
  • Replacement: Add 20–40 mEq KCl to each liter of IV fluid to maintain serum levels. Infusion rates should not exceed 20 mEq/h via peripheral line or 40 mEq/h via central line (with continuous telemetry).
  • Insulin delay: If initial serum K+ is <3.3 mEq/L, hold insulin and replete potassium first.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Severe Hypokalemia

Severe hypokalemia (<2.7 mEq/L) is a medical emergency that can precipitate fatal arrhythmias. It demands central venous access for rapid, concentrated repletion and continuous ECG monitoring.

C. Fluid Overload

  • Recognition: New pulmonary crackles, jugular venous distension, positive fluid balance >2 L/24 h, or new/worsening peripheral edema.
  • Management:
    • Reduce maintenance fluid rate to 1.5–2 mL/kg/h.
    • Administer a loop diuretic (e.g., furosemide 20–40 mg IV) and titrate based on urine output.
    • Monitor daily weights, strict intake/output, and chest imaging as needed.
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Balancing Fluids

Balance the resolution of osmotic diuresis with underlying cardiac and renal comorbidities. Patients with heart failure or ESRD are at highest risk for iatrogenic fluid overload.

D. Cerebral Edema

  • Early warning signs: Headache, bradycardia, hypertension (Cushing’s triad), or altered mental status despite metabolic improvement.
  • Immediate therapy:
    • Mannitol 0.5–1 g/kg IV over 20 minutes OR Hypertonic saline (3%) 5–10 mL/kg over 30 minutes.
    • Elevate head of bed to 30 degrees.
    • If intubated, provide controlled ventilation to a target PaCO₂ of 30–35 mmHg.
    • Reduce fluid infusion rate by 50% and obtain emergent neuroimaging (CT head).
Pearl IconA shield with an exclamation mark, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl: Cerebral Edema in Adults

Though rare in adults compared to children, cerebral edema carries a mortality rate of approximately 30%. Maintain a high index of suspicion and act immediately on subtle neurologic changes.

4. Multidisciplinary Goals-of-Care Discussions

In refractory or complicated hyperglycemic crises, multidisciplinary and ethical frameworks guide invasive support decisions while honoring patient values.

A. Ethical Framework

Discussions should be guided by core principles of medical ethics:

  • Beneficence: Acting in the best interest of the patient.
  • Non-maleficence: Avoiding harm.
  • Autonomy: Respecting the patient’s right to make decisions about their own care.
  • Proportionality: Ensuring the potential benefits of interventions outweigh the burdens.

B. Palliative Care and Family Engagement

  • Consider early palliative care consultation for complex symptom management and to help clarify goals of care.
  • Conduct regular interdisciplinary family meetings involving critical care, endocrinology, pharmacy, and nursing to ensure consistent communication.

C. Documentation and Shared Decision-Making

  • Clearly document all discussions regarding risks, benefits, alternatives, and patient/family preferences.
  • Ensure advance directives and code status are clearly recorded and accessible.
  • Revisit goals of care as the clinical status evolves to ensure that ongoing treatment aligns with the patient’s expressed values.

References

  1. Umpierrez GE, Davis GM, ElSayed NA, et al. Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: A consensus report. Diabetologia. 2024;67(7):1455–1479.
  2. Aldhaeefi M, Aldardeer NF, Alkhani N, et al. Updates in the Management of Hyperglycemic Crisis. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022;2:820728.
  3. Fayfman M, Pasquel FJ, Umpierrez GE. Management of Hyperglycemic Crises: DKA and HHS. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101(3):587–606.
  4. Keenan CR, Murin S, White RH. High Risk for VTE in Diabetics With Hyperosmolar State. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(6):1185–1190.
  5. Arora S, Cheng D, Wyler B, Menchine M. Prevalence of hypokalemia in ED patients with DKA. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(3):481–484.
  6. Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Murphy MB, et al. Management of Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):131–153.