Foundational Principles of Mechanical Ventilation and Pharmacologic Concepts
Objective
Describe the foundational principles of mechanical ventilation and key pharmacologic considerations in critically ill, ventilated patients.
I. Indications for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Invasive ventilation supports gas exchange and protects the airway when spontaneous breathing or airway defense is insufficient. Recognize four major indications to guide timely intubation and pharmacologic planning.
Hypoxemic respiratory failure
- PaO₂ < 60 mm Hg on room air or PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300
- Common causes: ARDS, severe pneumonia, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, sepsis
- Goals: optimize oxygenation, reduce work of breathing, prevent ventilator-induced lung injury
Hypercapnic respiratory failure
- PaCO₂ > 50 mm Hg with pH < 7.35
- Etiologies: COPD exacerbation, neuromuscular weakness, chest wall restriction
- Goals: restore alveolar ventilation, correct acid–base balance
Airway protection
- Impaired consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), high aspiration risk, airway edema
- Preemptive intubation to prevent aspiration or prevent airway loss
Procedural ventilation
- Short-term support for surgery, bronchoscopy, endoscopy in high-risk patients
- Requires short-acting sedatives/analgesics and rapid recovery profile
Key Pearls
- Hypoxemic vs. hypercapnic failure have distinct ventilator and sedation targets.
- Airway protection decisions hinge on neurologic status and aspiration risk.
II. Mechanical Ventilation Modes and Pharmacologic Implications
Ventilator modes differ in how breaths are delivered and influence sedation depth, hemodynamics, and drug clearance. Tailor sedation and fluid management to the chosen mode.
II.a Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)
- Preset tidal volume; airway pressures vary with compliance/resistance
- Ensures consistent minute ventilation; high pressures may cause barotrauma
- Often requires deeper sedation or neuromuscular blockade to prevent dyssynchrony
II.b Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV)
- Preset inspiratory pressure; tidal volume varies with mechanics
- May improve comfort and lower barotrauma risk
- Monitor for hypoventilation if compliance worsens; adjust sedatives to avoid hypoventilation
II.c Assist-Control Ventilation (ACV)
- Mandatory rate + patient-triggered breaths at preset volume/pressure
- Risk of double-triggering if patient drive mismatches ventilator
- Sedation titration balances comfort against suppression of respiratory drive
II.d Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) & SIMV
- PSV: patient-initiated breaths supported by fixed pressure; promotes weaning
- SIMV: combines mandatory breaths with spontaneous efforts
- Enable lighter sedation, early mobilization, reduced ICU-acquired weakness
Key Pearls
- Fixed-volume modes (VCV, ACV) often drive higher sedation needs; spontaneous modes (PSV, SIMV) allow lighter sedation.
- High PEEP and intrathoracic pressure can reduce venous return—monitor hemodynamics and adjust vasoactive drugs.
III. Physiologic Consequences Affecting Drug Disposition
Positive-pressure ventilation triggers hemodynamic and fluid shifts that alter drug pharmacokinetics. Anticipate changes in distribution, metabolism, and elimination.
- Hemodynamic shifts:
- ↑ intrathoracic pressure → ↓ venous return, ↓ cardiac output
- ↓ hepatic and renal perfusion → reduced drug clearance, risk of accumulation
- Capillary leak & expanded volume of distribution:
- Systemic inflammation increases permeability
- Hydrophilic drugs (beta-lactams, aminoglycosides) require higher loading doses
- Fluid shifts & third spacing:
- Aggressive resuscitation → interstitial fluid accumulation
- Dilutes plasma concentrations; complicates dosing of water-soluble agents
- Organ perfusion changes:
- Hypoperfusion impairs hepatic metabolism and renal excretion
- Adjust doses of high-extraction drugs and renally cleared medications
- Acid–base & temperature derangements:
- Respiratory acidosis alters drug ionization and protein binding
- Hypothermia prolongs metabolic clearance and half-lives
Key Pearls
- Reassess drug levels and organ function after ventilator setting changes.
- Hydrophilic antibiotics often require loading-dose adjustments; lipophilic sedatives accumulate in organ dysfunction.
IV. Pharmacologic Considerations in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Sedation, analgesia, and adjunctive therapies must be individualized based on ventilator mode, hemodynamics, fluid status, and acid–base balance.
- Sedation & analgesia interplay:
- Deeper sedation for fixed-volume modes or neuromuscular blockade
- Lighter sedation for spontaneous modes to preserve respiratory drive
- Choose agents with rapid onset/offset if frequent neurologic assessment is needed
- Hemodynamic effects on metabolism:
- ↓ cardiac output prolongs half-life of high-extraction drugs (e.g., propofol)
- Monitor blood pressure closely when titrating sedatives with vasodilatory properties
- Fluid status modifying distribution:
- Volume overload dilutes hydrophilic drugs; monitor trough levels for antibiotics
- Ultrafiltration or CRRT can rapidly decrease drug levels; adjust intervals
- Organ perfusion shifts requiring dose adjustments:
- Use kidney-friendly sedation in AKI; reduce benzodiazepine infusion rates if clearance falls
- In hepatic failure, prefer remifentanil over fentanyl for shorter context-sensitive half-time
- Acid–base derangements influencing receptor kinetics:
- Acidosis increases free fraction of basic drugs, heightening effect/toxicity
- Titrate neuromuscular blockers carefully in acidemic patients
Key Pearls
- Coordinate sedation choice with anticipated ventilation changes and organ function.
- Propofol and dexmedetomidine require close hemodynamic monitoring; benzodiazepines risk accumulation.
V. Clinical Integration and Practice Pearls
Apply these principles through case examples to optimize ventilator synchrony and pharmacotherapy.
Case 1: ARDS on High PEEP + VCV
- High PEEP → ↓ venous return → hypotension
- Strategy: titrate propofol infusion slowly; consider norepinephrine to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg
- Monitor: sedation depth (RASS –2 to 0), hemodynamics, propofol triglycerides
Case 2: COPD Exacerbation on PSV
- Goal: preserve spontaneous effort and rapid weaning
- Strategy: low-dose dexmedetomidine for comfort without suppressing drive
- Monitor: respiratory rate, PaCO₂, sedation score (RASS 0 to –1)
Key Takeaways
- Match sedation depth to ventilator mode and underlying pathophysiology.
- Anticipate the impact of ventilator pressures on drug clearance and distribution.
- Frequent reassessment of sedation, organ function, and ventilator synchrony is critical.
References
- Dugernier J, Reychler G, Wittebole X, et al. Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:73.
- Ari A, Harwood RJ, Sheard MM, et al. Pressurized metered-dose inhalers versus nebulizers in the treatment of mechanically ventilated subjects with artificial airways: an in vitro study. Respir Care. 2015;60:1570-74.
- Ehrmann S, Roche-Campo F, Bodet-Contentin L, et al. Aerosol therapy in intensive and intermediate care units: prospective observation of 2808 critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:192-201.
- Liu CY, Ko HK, Fink JB, et al. Size distribution of colistin delivery by different type nebulizers and concentrations during mechanical ventilation. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:459.
- Ge HQ, Wang JM, Lin HL, et al. Effect of nebulizer location and spontaneous breathing on aerosol delivery during airway pressure release ventilation in bench testing. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2019;32:34-9.
- Fink JB. Aerosol Drug Therapy. In: Kacmarek RM, Stoller JK, Heuer AJ, editors. Egan’s Fundamentals of Respiratory Care. 10th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Mosby; 2013:849-873.
- MacIntyre NR, Silver RM, Miller CW, et al. Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:81-84.
- Fuller HD, Dolovich MB, Posmituck G, et al. Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients: comparison of dose to the lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:440-44.