PACULit Literature Updates September 2025: Oncology
-
Immune mediated adverse events in the randomized phase 3 TOPAZ 1 study of durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma DREAMM7 updated overall survival analysis from a global randomised open label phase 3 trial1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
PACULit Daily Literature Update: Real-world patient profile and step-up dosing process of early initiators of teclistamab for multiple myeloma in US hospitals An analysis using the Premier Healthcare Database1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
PACULit Daily Literature Update: Effects of BojungikkiTang on immune response and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors a randomized pilot study1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
PACULit Daily Literature Update: Long acting lipegfilgrastim and antimicrobials as vigorous primary prophylaxis in bendamustine treated patients with indolent B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma a multicentric real life experience1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
First-line treatment with HDACis plus tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC a single-arm phase II study1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Comparison of outcomes with elranatamab and real world treatments in the UK for triple class exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Overall Survival with Inavolisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Enhanced CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma after Previous Failure1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Phase I II clinical trial on the safety and preliminary efficacy of donor derived anti leukemia cytotoxic T lymphocytes for the prevention of leukemia relapse in children given haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation study rational and design1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy for the treatment of frontline systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma subgroup analysis of the ECHELON2 study at 5 years followup1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Clinical Practice A Brazilian Multicenter Study1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Talquetamab improves patient reported symptoms and health related quality of life in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma Results from the phase 12 MonumenTAL1 study1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Durvalumab Alone or Combined With Novel Agents for Unresectable Stage III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Update From the COAST Randomized Clinical Trial1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Real world patient profile and step up dosing process of early initiators of teclistamab for multiple myeloma in US hospitals An analysis using the Premier Healthcare Database1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Virtual reality for outpatient management of cancer pain a pilot dosing study1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy for the treatment of frontline systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Optimal treatment duration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors should we treat beyond two years1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
Effects of Metformin on Survival and Toxicity in Patients with Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nivolumab1 Topic|1 Quiz
-
ACPE Required Forms: PACULit Literature Updates September 2025: Oncology3 Topics
Participants 440
Optimal treatment duration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors should we treat beyond two years

Daily Literature Update
Optimal treatment duration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors should we treat beyond two years
Decruyenaere A, Christine G, Rottey S, et al. Acta Oncol. 2025;64:979-988. doi:10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43876.
Introduction
This study evaluates whether metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors can safely discontinue therapy after two years without sacrificing outcomes.
Study Overview
Study Type: Multicenter retrospective cohort with causal inference
Population: 95 mRCC responders treated 63;21 months
Intervention: Elective ICPI discontinuation between 21-25 months vs continuous therapy
Outcomes: PFS, OS, CSS; median follow-up 62.1 months
- Median treatment duration was 33.8 months, 60% discontinued ICPIs electively
- 3-year PFS after elective ICPI stop was 57.1%, OS 67.5%, CSS 90%
- No significant increase in progression/death hazard with discontinuation (HR 1.08, p=0.766)
- Discontinuation at 21-25 months linked with metachronous metastases and complete response
- Modest PFS advantage with continuation contrasted with significantly prolonged treatment exposure
Context & Related Research
- Motzer et al., 2024: Fixed 24-month ICPI regimen showed durable 2-year PFS ~58% (PMID: Not provided); informs duration feasibility.
- Gupta et al., 2025: ICB doublet therapy improves treatment-free survival in mRCC (PMID:39743422), supporting elective discontinuation.
- Fransen van de Putte et al., 2023: Durable off-treatment survival after ICPI discontinuation post-deferred nephrectomy (PMID:37693729).
- ESMO & NCCN Guidelines: Recommend elective ICPI cessation after ~2 years in durable responders.
Clinical Implications
- Elective ICPI discontinuation at ~2 years is safe for responding mRCC patients, decreasing toxicity and treatment burden.
- Deep responders (complete response) and metachronous metastatic pattern may predict better outcomes for discontinuation.
- Future research should evaluate biomarkers and prospective trials for optimizing treatment duration.
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths | Limitations |
---|---|
Multicenter cohort; causal inference to reduce bias | Retrospective design; potential unmeasured confounders |
Long median follow-up; homogenous responder population | Small subgroup discontinuing 2125 months; no central imaging review |
Detailed adjustment for confounders | No adjusted OS/CSS analyses due to few deaths |
Future Directions
Prospective randomized trials and biomarker validation are warranted to establish firm guidelines on ICPI treatment duration in mRCC responders.
For mRCC patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors, elective discontinuation after approximately two years is safe and does not compromise survival outcomes.
Listen to the Podcast
A short discussion of today’s highlight.