Back to Course

2025 PACUPrep BCCCP Preparatory Course

0% Complete
0/0 Steps
  1. Pulmonary

    ARDS
    4 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  2. Asthma Exacerbation
    4 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  3. COPD Exacerbation
    4 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  4. Cystic Fibrosis
    6 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  5. Drug-Induced Pulmonary Diseases
    3 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  6. Mechanical Ventilation Pharmacotherapy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  7. Pleural Disorders
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  8. Pulmonary Hypertension (Acute and Chronic severe pulmonary hypertension)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  9. Cardiology
    Acute Coronary Syndromes
    6 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  10. Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter
    6 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  11. Cardiogenic Shock
    4 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  12. Heart Failure
    7 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  13. Hypertensive Crises
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  14. Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  15. NEPHROLOGY
    Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  16. Contrast‐Induced Nephropathy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  17. Drug‐Induced Kidney Diseases
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  18. Rhabdomyolysis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  19. Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  20. Renal Replacement Therapies (RRT)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  21. Neurology
    Status Epilepticus
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  22. Acute Ischemic Stroke
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  23. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  24. Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  25. Neuromonitoring Techniques
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  26. Gastroenterology
    Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  27. Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  28. Acute Pancreatitis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  29. Enterocutaneous and Enteroatmospheric Fistulas
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  30. Ileus and Acute Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  31. Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  32. Hepatology
    Acute Liver Failure
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  33. Portal Hypertension & Variceal Hemorrhage
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  34. Hepatic Encephalopathy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  35. Ascites & Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  36. Hepatorenal Syndrome
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  37. Drug-Induced Liver Injury
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  38. Dermatology
    Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  39. Erythema multiforme
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  40. Drug Reaction (or Rash) with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  41. Immunology
    Transplant Immunology & Acute Rejection
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  42. Solid Organ & Hematopoietic Transplant Pharmacotherapy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  43. Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  44. Hypersensitivity Reactions & Desensitization
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  45. Biologic Immunotherapies & Cytokine Release Syndrome
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  46. Endocrinology
    Relative Adrenal Insufficiency and Stress-Dose Steroid Therapy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  47. Hyperglycemic Crisis (DKA & HHS)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  48. Glycemic Control in the ICU
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  49. Thyroid Emergencies: Thyroid Storm & Myxedema Coma
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  50. Hematology
    Acute Venous Thromboembolism
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  51. Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  52. Anemia of Critical Illness
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  53. Drug-Induced Hematologic Disorders
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  54. Sickle Cell Crisis in the ICU
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  55. Methemoglobinemia & Dyshemoglobinemias
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  56. Toxicology
    Toxidrome Recognition and Initial Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  57. Management of Acute Overdoses – Non-Cardiovascular Agents
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  58. Management of Acute Overdoses – Cardiovascular Agents
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  59. Toxic Alcohols and Small-Molecule Poisons
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  60. Antidotes and Gastrointestinal Decontamination
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  61. Extracorporeal Removal Techniques
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  62. Withdrawal Syndromes in the ICU
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  63. Infectious Diseases
    Sepsis and Septic Shock
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  64. Pneumonia (CAP, HAP, VAP)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  65. Endocarditis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  66. CNS Infections
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  67. Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  68. Antibiotic Stewardship & PK/PD
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  69. Clostridioides difficile Infection
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  70. Febrile Neutropenia & Immunocompromised Hosts
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  71. Skin & Soft-Tissue Infections / Acute Osteomyelitis
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  72. Urinary Tract and Catheter-related Infections
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  73. Pandemic & Emerging Viral Infections
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  74. Supportive Care (Pain, Agitation, Delirium, Immobility, Sleep)
    Pain Assessment and Analgesic Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  75. Sedation and Agitation Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  76. Delirium Prevention and Treatment
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  77. Sleep Disturbance Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  78. Immobility and Early Mobilization
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  79. Oncologic Emergencies
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  80. End-of-Life Care & Palliative Care
    Goals of Care & Advance Care Planning
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  81. Pain Management & Opioid Therapy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  82. Dyspnea & Respiratory Symptom Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  83. Sedation & Palliative Sedation
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  84. Delirium Agitation & Anxiety
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  85. Nausea, Vomiting & Gastrointestinal Symptoms
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  86. Management of Secretions (Death Rattle)
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  87. Fluids, Electrolytes, and Nutrition Management
    Intravenous Fluid Therapy and Resuscitation
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  88. Acid–Base Disorders
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  89. Sodium Homeostasis and Dysnatremias
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  90. Potassium Disorders
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  91. Calcium and Magnesium Abnormalities
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  92. Phosphate and Trace Electrolyte Management
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  93. Enteral Nutrition Support
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  94. Parenteral Nutrition Support
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  95. Refeeding Syndrome and Specialized Nutrition
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  96. Trauma and Burns
    Initial Resuscitation and Fluid Management in Trauma
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  97. Hemorrhagic Shock, Massive Transfusion, and Trauma‐Induced Coagulopathy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  98. Burns Pharmacotherapy
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  99. Burn Wound Care
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz
  100. Open Fracture Antibiotics
    5 Topics
    |
    1 Quiz

Participants 432

  • Allison Clemens
  • April
  • ababaabhay
  • achoi2392
  • adhoward1
Show more
Lesson 68, Topic 3
In Progress

Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy Planning and PK/PD Optimization in Critically Ill Patients

Lesson Progress
0% Complete
Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy Planning in Critically Ill Patients

Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy Planning and PK/PD Optimization in Critically Ill Patients

Objectives Icon A clipboard with a checkmark, symbolizing evidence-based planning.

Objective

Design an evidence-based, escalating antimicrobial plan for critically ill patients using stewardship and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles.

1. Selection of Empiric and First-line Antimicrobial Agents

In sepsis and severe ICU infections, the immediate initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics, ideally within the first hour of recognition, is a cornerstone of therapy. This initial selection must be thoughtfully tailored to the suspected site of infection, local institutional antibiograms, and patient-specific risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. The goal is to provide effective coverage promptly while planning for rapid de-escalation to limit the development of resistance and minimize drug toxicity.

Guideline-Based Regimens by Infection Site

  • Hospital/Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP/VAP): An anti-pseudomonal β-lactam (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem) is standard. Add MRSA coverage (e.g., vancomycin, linezolid) for patients with risk factors. Monotherapy may be considered in low-risk settings.
  • Intra-abdominal Infections: Agents with robust anaerobic and gram-negative coverage are required, such as a carbapenem or piperacillin-tazobactam.
  • Bloodstream Infections/Endocarditis: Empiric therapy often includes vancomycin for MRSA coverage plus a gram-negative agent (e.g., cefepime) if risk factors for Pseudomonas are present.
  • Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI): For severe cases, cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam is appropriate. Narrower-spectrum agents can be used in less severe presentations.

Local Resistance and Formulary Constraints

Effective empiric therapy is impossible without knowledge of local resistance patterns. ICU-specific antibiograms are superior to hospital-wide data. High rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers may necessitate the first-line use of carbapenems. Conversely, in units with low MRSA prevalence, routine empiric vancomycin use should be questioned. Institutional policies like preauthorization for broad-spectrum agents are key stewardship tools.

De-escalation Triggers

The plan to de-escalate should begin at the moment of initiation. At 48–72 hours, a formal review should be conducted, considering culture and susceptibility results, procalcitonin trends, and overall clinical improvement (e.g., hemodynamic stability, reduced oxygen requirement) to narrow therapy.

Pearl Icon A lightbulb, indicating a clinical pearl. Key Pearls
  • “Hard Stop” Orders: Implementing automatic “hard stop” orders for broad-spectrum antibiotics at 72 hours forces a clinical re-evaluation and is a highly effective stewardship intervention to prompt review and narrowing of therapy.
  • Short is (Usually) Better: A growing body of evidence supports that short courses of antibiotics (e.g., 5–7 days) are as effective as longer courses for most common ICU infections, including VAP and intra-abdominal infections, in patients who demonstrate a good clinical response.

2. Adjunctive and Second-line Therapies

While monotherapy is sufficient for most infections once susceptibilities are known, combination therapy or second-line agents are reserved for specific, evidence-based indications. The goal is to leverage synergy, cover potential resistance gaps, or achieve rapid sterilization in critical infections, followed by prompt de-escalation to a single, targeted agent.

Indications for Combination Therapy

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Synergy: In severe infections like VAP or bacteremia caused by *P. aeruginosa*, combining a β-lactam with an aminoglycoside or a fluoroquinolone for the first 3-5 days is sometimes employed to achieve synergistic killing and prevent resistance, though this practice is debated.
  • Severe Infections: In endocarditis or meningitis, combination therapy may be used to expedite bacterial clearance and improve outcomes.

Safety and Drug Interactions

Adjunctive agents often carry significant toxicity risks that require careful monitoring.

  • Nephrotoxicity: Aminoglycosides and polymyxins are notoriously nephrotoxic. Renal function must be monitored closely, and concurrent use of other nephrotoxins (e.g., vancomycin, vasopressors) should be minimized.
  • QT Prolongation: Fluoroquinolones and macrolides can prolong the QT interval. A baseline ECG is recommended, especially in patients with other risk factors or on other QT-prolonging medications.
Pearl Icon A lightbulb, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearls
  • Avoid prolonged combination therapy beyond the initial empiric phase unless there is a documented need for synergy (e.g., enterococcal endocarditis).
  • Engage clinical pharmacy services for review before adding potentially toxic adjunctive agents to ensure appropriate indications and monitoring plans are in place.

3. Application of PK/PD Principles to Dosing Regimens

Critical illness profoundly alters pharmacokinetics. The systemic inflammatory response leads to capillary leak, aggressive fluid resuscitation, and organ dysfunction, which collectively alter drug volume of distribution (Vd), protein binding, and clearance. Standard “one-size-fits-all” dosing is often inadequate; dosing must be individualized.

Volume of Distribution (Vd) & Protein Binding

  • Hydrophilic Drugs: Agents like β-lactams and aminoglycosides have a significantly increased Vd in septic shock due to fluid shifts. This can lead to subtherapeutic concentrations. A higher-than-standard loading dose (e.g., 1.5–2 times normal) is often necessary to rapidly achieve target concentrations.
  • Protein Binding: Hypoalbuminemia is common in critical illness. For highly protein-bound drugs like ceftriaxone, this increases the free (active) fraction of the drug, which can paradoxically increase its clearance and lead to unpredictable drug levels.

Renal Dysfunction & Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication that dramatically affects drug clearance. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) adds another layer of complexity, as it can efficiently clear small, hydrophilic antibiotics. Dosing in this setting requires specialized resources, such as pharmacokinetic models and Bayesian dosing software. While nomograms exist for common drugs like vancomycin and meropenem on CRRT, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the advised standard of care.

Editor’s Note on Hepatic Impairment: Insufficient source material was available for a detailed section. A complete chapter would include specific dose adjustment recommendations for agents cleared by the liver (e.g., metronidazole, ceftriaxone, clindamycin) in patients with hepatic failure, discuss the impact of liver dysfunction on drug metabolism and protein binding, and outline relevant monitoring parameters.

Pearl Icon A lightbulb, indicating a clinical pearl. Key Pearl

In septic shock with aggressive fluid resuscitation, base the loading dose of hydrophilic antibiotics on the patient’s predicted Vd (often using an adjusted or ideal body weight in obese patients) rather than actual weight alone. This helps overcome the “dilutional” effect of resuscitation fluids and achieve therapeutic targets faster.

4. Route of Administration and Delivery Device Optimization

How a drug is delivered can be as important as which drug is chosen. For time-dependent antibiotics like β-lactams, optimizing the duration of exposure above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is key to efficacy. This involves moving beyond traditional intermittent infusions.

Antibiotic Infusion Strategies and %T>MIC A graph comparing three antibiotic infusion methods: intermittent, extended, and continuous. It shows how extended and continuous infusions maintain drug concentration above the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for a greater percentage of the dosing interval, which is the goal for time-dependent antibiotics. Time Concentration MIC Intermittent Extended Continuous
Figure 1: Optimizing Time Above MIC (%T>MIC). This graph illustrates how, for the same total daily dose, extended and continuous infusions maintain drug concentrations above the MIC for a longer duration compared to traditional intermittent bolus infusions. This strategy is crucial for maximizing the efficacy of time-dependent antibiotics like β-lactams.

Intravenous Infusion Techniques

  • Extended Infusion: Infusing a drug over a longer period (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g over 4 hours every 8 hours) is a practical way to significantly improve %T>MIC compared to a 30-minute infusion.
  • Continuous Infusion: After a loading dose, providing the total daily dose as a continuous infusion (e.g., 13.5 g of piperacillin-tazobactam over 24 hours) maintains a steady-state concentration, which is the most reliable way to achieve PK/PD targets, especially against less susceptible organisms.

Editor’s Note on Enteral Access: Insufficient source material was available for a detailed section. A complete chapter would discuss the high variability of drug absorption from the gut in critically ill patients, issues with drug formulation clogging feeding tubes, the impact of altered gastric pH on drug stability, and critical incompatibilities between medications and enteral feeding formulas.

Pearl Icon A lightbulb, indicating a clinical pearl. Clinical Pearl

Before implementing extended or continuous infusion protocols, validate them with clinical pharmacy and nursing leadership. This ensures that issues like drug stability at room temperature, IV line compatibility, and the need for dedicated line access are addressed to prevent medication errors and ensure consistent delivery.

5. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) and Pharmacoeconomic Assessment

TDM is the practice of measuring drug concentrations in blood to individualize dosing. It is essential for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index and high pharmacokinetic variability. In the ICU, TDM helps achieve PK/PD targets, minimize toxicity, and ultimately reduce costs.

  • Vancomycin TDM: The modern standard of care is to target an Area Under the Curve to MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of 400–600. This is best achieved using Bayesian software models, which can accurately predict the AUC from as few as two post-dose drug levels. Trough-only monitoring is now considered inferior as it correlates poorly with efficacy and is a less reliable predictor of nephrotoxicity.
  • Aminoglycoside TDM: For these concentration-dependent killers, the goal is a high peak concentration (Cmax/MIC ratio ≥8–10) to maximize bactericidal activity and a low trough (<2 mg/L) to minimize toxicity. This typically involves obtaining a peak level 30 minutes after the infusion ends and a trough level just before the next dose.
  • β-lactam TDM: While not yet routine in all centers, TDM for β-lactams is an emerging practice. Clinical trials support its use for piperacillin and meropenem in critically ill patients, especially those with renal dysfunction or on RRT, to ensure %T>MIC targets are met.

Pharmacoeconomics

Robust antimicrobial stewardship programs that incorporate TDM, PK/PD-optimized dosing strategies like continuous infusions, and rapid de-escalation have demonstrated significant economic benefits. Studies show these programs can reduce antibiotic acquisition costs by over 20%, shorten ICU length of stay, and reduce rates of antibiotic-associated complications like C. difficile infection and AKI.

Pearl Icon A lightbulb, indicating a clinical pearl. Key Points
  • Coordinate TDM sampling times carefully with nursing protocols. The timing of blood draws is critical for accurate AUC estimation, especially when using Bayesian software.
  • Continuous-infusion strategies not only optimize PK/PD but can also reduce drug waste by using a single bag over 24 hours instead of multiple smaller vials and IV bags.

6. Pharmacotherapy Profiles

This section provides a detailed overview of the major antibiotic classes used in critically ill patients, focusing on their practical application and PK/PD considerations.

Beta-Lactams (e.g., Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Meropenem, Cefepime)

Pharmacotherapy Profile: Beta-Lactams
Aspect Details
Mechanism of Action Bind to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) to inhibit bacterial cell-wall synthesis. Efficacy is driven by time-dependent killing (%T>MIC).
Dosing Examples (Pip-Tazo)
  • Intermittent: 4.5 g IV over 30 min every 6 hours.
  • Extended Infusion: 3.375 g IV over 4 hours every 8 hours.
  • Continuous Infusion: 4.5 g IV loading dose, followed by 13.5 g over 24 hours.
Monitoring Target %T>MIC of 50-70% of the dosing interval (or 100% T>MIC for severe infections). Monitor daily serum creatinine and for signs of neurotoxicity (especially with cefepime at high doses).
Contraindications History of severe, IgE-mediated allergy (anaphylaxis) to any β-lactam. Use with caution in patients with a history of seizures, as high doses in the setting of renal failure can lower the seizure threshold.
Advantages / Disadvantages Extended and continuous infusions reliably improve PK/PD target attainment but require institutional protocols, stability data, and often dedicated IV line access.
Pearl IconA lightbulb icon. Clinical Pearl/Pitfall

In patients with significant fluid overload or hypoalbuminemia, the free (unbound) concentration of highly protein-bound β-lactams like ceftriaxone or ertapenem can be unpredictable. If TDM is available, measuring unbound levels can help avoid therapeutic failure from underdosing.

Controversy IconA chat bubble with a question mark. Guideline Controversy

The routine use of continuous infusions for all patients is still debated. While beneficial for organisms with elevated MICs, the clinical benefit over well-dosed extended infusions for highly susceptible organisms (e.g., MIC ≤1 mg/L) is less certain and may not justify the logistical complexity.

Vancomycin

Pharmacotherapy Profile: Vancomycin
Aspect Details
Mechanism of Action Inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus of peptidoglycan precursors. Efficacy is driven by the AUC/MIC ratio.
PK/PD Target & Dosing Target an AUC₀–₂₄/MIC ratio of 400–600 for MRSA infections. Loading doses of 25–30 mg/kg are often required in critically ill patients to achieve this target rapidly.
TDM Strategy AUC-guided monitoring using Bayesian software is the preferred method. It is more accurate and has a stronger association with clinical outcomes and nephrotoxicity risk than trough-only monitoring.
Monitoring Serum creatinine at baseline and at least every 48 hours. Monitor infusion rate (≤1 gram per hour) to prevent vancomycin infusion reaction (“red man syndrome”).
Comparative Data Consider alternatives like daptomycin or linezolid for invasive MRSA infections if the vancomycin MIC is ≥2 mg/L, or if the patient develops significant nephrotoxicity.
Pearl IconA lightbulb icon. Clinical Pearl/Pitfall

Always obtain relevant cultures (e.g., blood, respiratory) *before* administering the first dose of vancomycin whenever possible. Delaying therapy is not advised, but pre-treatment cultures are invaluable for later de-escalation.

Controversy IconA chat bubble with a question mark. Guideline Controversy

There is ongoing debate about the optimal upper AUC ceiling. While most guidelines recommend staying below 600-650 to minimize nephrotoxicity, some experts argue for more aggressive targets (e.g., AUC >700) in severe, deep-seated infections like MRSA meningitis or endocarditis, accepting a higher risk of AKI for potential efficacy benefits.

Aminoglycosides (e.g., Gentamicin, Tobramycin)

Pharmacotherapy Profile: Aminoglycosides
Aspect Details
Mechanism of Action Irreversibly bind to the 30S ribosomal subunit, blocking protein synthesis. Efficacy is driven by concentration-dependent killing (Cmax/MIC).
PK/PD Target Target a peak concentration to MIC ratio (Cmax/MIC) of ≥8–10 to maximize bactericidal effect and leverage the post-antibiotic effect.
Dosing Utilize once-daily, high-dose extended-interval dosing (e.g., gentamicin 5–7 mg/kg) in patients with normal renal function to achieve high peaks and allow drug-free periods to reduce toxicity. Dose adjustments and TDM are mandatory in renal impairment or RRT.
TDM Obtain a peak level 30 minutes after a 30-minute infusion and a trough level immediately before the next dose. The peak guides efficacy (dose adjustment), while the trough guides safety (dosing interval adjustment).
Monitoring Daily serum creatinine is essential. For courses longer than 5 days, consider baseline and follow-up audiology screening due to the risk of ototoxicity.
Contraindications Use with extreme caution in patients with pre-existing hearing loss or vestibular dysfunction. Can potentiate neuromuscular blockade.
Pearl IconA lightbulb icon. Key Decision Points

Aminoglycosides should be reserved for specific indications: short-term (3-5 days) synergistic therapy for gram-negative infections or as a core component of therapy for documented MDR pathogens. Avoid prolonged courses and concurrent administration of other nephrotoxins (e.g., polymyxins, amphotericin B) whenever possible.

References

  1. Dellit TH, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):159–177.
  2. Pollack LA, Srinivasan A. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl 3):S97–S100.
  3. Onita T, et al. A review of the current evidence for continuous infusion beta-lactam antibiotic therapy. Antibiotics. 2025;14(1):92.
  4. MacDougall C, Polk RE. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in health care systems. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):638–656.
  5. Abdul-Aziz MH, et al. Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a position paper. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1127–1153.
  6. Aljefri DM, et al. A review of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam. Pharmacotherapy. 2021;41(2):162–182.
  7. Rybak MJ, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(9):835–864.
  8. Grant EM, et al. Aminoglycoside dosing and monitoring: a guide for pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22(5):471–483.
  9. Zhao W, et al. Bayesian forecasting-based therapeutic drug monitoring of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(10):e00845-22.
  10. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(1):1–10.
  11. Singh N, et al. Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(2):505–511.
  12. De Waele JJ, et al. Daily versus intermittent administration of beta-lactams in critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(3):380–387.
  13. Meng L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous versus intermittent infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2023;43(3):226–246.
  14. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(4):388–416.
  15. Standiford HC, et al. The role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(4):338–345.